M/S. AMR INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the AO to complete the assessment de novo, correlating additions with the seized material. The AO was empowered to invoke relevant provisions to ensure assessee compliance.
What were the facts?
A search and seizure action was conducted in the Earth Group of cases, leading to the seizure of documents belonging to the assessee company. The assessee failed to comply with notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's non-compliance with notices, preventing a complete assessment of seized material. The Tribunal sought to ensure a fair assessment by allowing the AO to re-examine the case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 132,Section 276D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI
Before: Sh. Amit ShuklaDr. B. R. R. Kumar
Heard together (7 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
The present appeals have been filed by the assessee against the orders of ld. CIT(A)-31, New Delhi dated 09.11.2016.
Since, the issues involved in all these appeals are common which were heard together. to 863/Del/2017 2 AMR Infrastructure Ltd.
A search & seizure action u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was carried out in Earth Group of cases on 16.01.2013. During the course of search action, various documents belonging to the assessee company were found and seized. During the proceedings before the AO, the assessee has not complied to the notices issued by the AO. Further, even before the ld. CIT (A), there was no compliance on the part of the assessee.
From the record, we find that the revenue has initiated prosecution proceedings u/s 276D of the Income Tax Act. On going through the Assessment Order, we find that owing to the non-compliance, the complete records and facts have not been brought on record.
Hence, in the interest in the justice, we hereby remand the matter back to the file of the AO to complete the assessment de novo correlating additions the material found and seized during the search proceedings. The AO may invoke various provisions of the Income Tax Act as deemed fit to ensure the compliance of the assessee to the notices issued.
In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 24/08/2021.
More judgments on Section 132
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Naresh Chandra Khattar, Agra vs ITO Ward-1(1)(2), AgraITA 475/AGR/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026