SHRI. SHAM GULABRAI TULSYNI,UNITED KIGDOM vs. DCIT(IT)-1(1)(1), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 3776/MUM/2019Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 September 2022AY 2006-072 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for de novo adjudication after obtaining necessary information from foreign banks, subject to the assessee providing a fresh consent waiver and cooperating fully.

What were the facts?

The assessee challenged an assessment order for AY 2006-07. Both parties agreed to remit the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the delay in obtaining information from foreign banks, despite the assessee's consent waiver, necessitating a fresh adjudication.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘I’ BENCH, MUMBAI

Appearances: Dr K. Shivram along with Rahul Hakani for the appellant Soumendu Kumar Dash for the respondent Date of concluding the hearing : 27.09.2022 Date of pronouncement the order : 30.09.2022

O R D E R Per Pramod Kumar, VP:

1.

By way of this appeal, the assessee appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 13.03.2019 in the matter of assessment under section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act 1961, for the assessment year 2006-07.

2.

When this appeal came up for hearing today, learned representatives agreed that the matter can be remitted to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication in the light of such information as the Assessing Officer may be able to obtain from the banks abroad, as a result of consent waiver filed by the assessee. Learned counsel for the assessee nevertheless pointed out that the Assessing Officer has been allowed substantial time to collect such Assessment Year: 2006-07 Page 2 of 2 information is obtained as yet. Learned Departmental Representative, on the other hand, submitted that there were certain defects in the consent wavier filed by the assessee and that there are certain procedural issues resulting in delay in obtaining the requisite information even though all reasonable steps have been taken by the Assessing Officer for that purpose. Learned counsel for the assessee points out that the consent waiver was given, over three years ago, on the format specified by the Assessing Officer, though the assessee is willing to co-operate by giving fresh consent waiver in whatever manner required.

3.

In view of the above position, and in view of the fact that the Assessing Officer is still in the process of requisitioning information, from the bank, we deem it fit and proper to remit the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for adjudication de novo after obtaining necessary information from the banks concerned, subject to the condition that the assessee will furnish fresh consent wavier form in such format as the Assessing Officer may specify, and fully co- operate with the Assessing Officer by furnishing such permissions, declarations and authorizations etc. to collect the information, as the Assessing Officer may requisition. The assessee will fully co-operate with the Assessing Officer in the remanded proceedings. Ordered, accordingly.

4.

We make it clear that as the matter has been remitted only on account of delay in collection of information in pursuant to the consent waiver, all contentions remain open.

5.

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes in the terms indicated above. Pronounced in the open court today on the 30th of September 2022

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →