What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

The assessee filed an appeal for assessment year 2012-13. The assessee subsequently requested to withdraw the appeal as they opted to settle the dispute under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Nancy Bansal, New Delhi vs ITO | ITAT Delhi 2021

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘E’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU & Ms. SUCHITRA KAMBLE

Hearing: 31.08.2021Pronounced: 31.08.2021

ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP :

This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2012-13 is directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-12, New Delhi, 22.03.2019.

None appeared on behalf of the assessee at the time of virtual hearing.

The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 09.08.2021, received by hand’, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by him and stated

2 ITA-4325/Del/2019 that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Above decision was announced on conclusion of Virtual Hearing on 31st August, 2021.

NANCY BANSAL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD- 34(3), NEW DELHI

What did the Tribunal hold?

What were the facts?

What were the issues?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Latest GST High Court judgments