AJAB SINGH,NOIDA vs. ITO, WARD- 1(1), NOIDA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 5375/DEL/2017Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 September 2021AY 2009-103 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the assessment order was passed ex parte and the CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal without a speaking order. Therefore, to ensure substantial justice, the case was restored to the AO for fresh decision after providing the assessee an opportunity to present their case.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the ITAT concerns assessment year 2009-10. The assessee claimed that the assessment order was passed ex parte as he could not represent his case before the AO, and the CIT(A) dismissed his appeal without considering the merits.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee was denied a proper opportunity to present their case before the AO and CIT(A), and if the CIT(A) order lacked a speaking order.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “A”: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI N.K. BILLAIYA & SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA

For Appellant: Shri Hifzul Hussain, Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Satpal Gulati, CIT (DR)
Hearing: 20/09/2021

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against order dated 30.6.2017 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) –1, Noida {CIT (A)} and pertains to assessment year 2009-10.

2.0 At the outset, the Ld. AR submitted that the assessee was unable to represent his case before the AO and, therefore, the order of assessment was passed ex parte. It was also submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the assessee’s case without properly considering the merits of the case and has summarily dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Ld. AR prayed that the assessee should be given an opportunity to present his case properly.

3.0 Per contra, the Ld. Sr. DR has submitted that the assessee did not avail of the various opportunities provided during the course of assessment proceedings and, therefore, the AO had no option but to pass the assessment order on the basis of the information and record before him.

4.0 Having heard the rival submissions and after having gone through the case files, it is undisputed that the assessment order was passed ex parte by the AO and it is further seen Ld. CIT(A) has also dismissed the assessee’s appeal without passing a speaking order. Therefore, looking into the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of substantial justice, we deem it appropriate to restore the file to the office of the AO for the purpose of deciding the issues at hand afresh after giving proper opportunity to the assessee to present his case. We also direct the assessee to fully cooperate during the remanded assessment proceedings.

5.0 In the final result the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →