CRONA INFRADEVELOPER PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 6(4), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the VSV scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) scheme and filed the necessary declarations. The department issued Form-3 under the scheme. The assessee then sought to withdraw the appeal before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and the subsequent resolution of the dispute under the scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (Assessment Year : 2011-12) Crona Infradeveloper Pvt. Vs. ITO Ltd., WZ 150, Flat No.120, Ward – 6(4), Jail Road, Pratap Nagar New Delhi New Delhi-110 064 PAN : AADCC 8612 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Shri Sahil Gupta, C.A. Revenue by Shri R. K. Gupta, Sr. DR Date of hearing: 05.10.2021 Date of Pronouncement: 05.10.2021 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 31.05.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.
Before me, assessee has moved an application dated 2nd September 2021 wherein the assessee has stated that it has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) 2020 and has filed the declaration (Form-1) and undertaking (Form-2) Scheme and 2 department had issued Form-3. The assessee therefore seeks to withdraw the appeal, to which the Revenue has no objection.
After considering the request made by the assessee, I dismiss the appeal of assessee as withdrawn subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. With these directions, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 05.10.2021, immediately after conclusion of the hearing of the matter in virtual mode.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026