SAROJ BALA KANODIA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 40(3), NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 9505/DEL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 October 2021AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal accepted the assessee's request for withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A) order for AY 2014-15. The assessee subsequently requested withdrawal of the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 5(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘A’ NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & SH. KULDIP SINGH

Hearing: 27.10.2021Pronounced: 27.10.2021

ORDER

PER R. K. PANDA, AM

1.

This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 31/10/2019 passed by CIT(A)-43, New Delhi for assessment year 2014-15.

2.

None appeared on behalf of assessee at the time of virtual hearing. The learned counsel for the assessee, vide its letter dated 09th October, 2021, received by email, has requested for withdrawal of the appeal filed by the assessee and stated that the assessee has opted to settle the dispute relating to the tax arrears for the assessment year under consideration under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. A certificate to this effect under Section 5(1) of The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has also been filed.

3.

Learned Senior DR has no objection.

4.

In view of the above, we accept the request of the assessee for withdrawal of the appeal.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

More judgments on Section 5(1)

All 1,811 judgments and leading authorities on Section 5(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →