M/S. TRIDOSS LABORATORIES PRIVATE LTD.,MUMBAI vs. ACIT CENT. CIR. - 14, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee was justified in not charging interest on loans to certain parties due to their poor financial condition and doubtful recovery of principal. For other parties, the interest-free advances were covered by the assessee's own funds.
What were the facts?
The assessee paid interest on borrowed funds but also provided interest-free loans to various parties. The Assessing Officer disallowed the entire interest expenditure, considering it a diversion of borrowed funds for non-business purposes.
What were the issues?
Whether interest paid on borrowed funds is allowable when interest-free advances are given to other parties, and if so, to what extent.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.2,118 citing313 ITR 340 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.1,261 citing366 ITR 505 · 2014 · HC
- CIT v. Shoorji Vallabhdas & Co.551 citing46 ITR 144 · 1962 · SC
- Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v. CIT514 citing225 ITR 746 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Bokaro Steel Ltd.370 citing236 ITR 315 · 1999 · SC
- E.D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd. v. CIT256 citing26 ITR 27 · 1954 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Sridev Enterprises125 citing192 ITR 165 · 1991 · HC
- 236 ITR 315; CIT v. Sarabhai4 citing307 ITR 89 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH & SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARYDr.
PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M): These cross appeals in & 1462/Mum/2018 for A.Y.2002-03 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14. Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-
2 ITA No. 1489/Mum/2018 & ITA No.1462/Mum/2018 M/s. Tridoss Laboratories Pvt Ltd.,
14/IT-69/05-06 dated 29/12/2017 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 36(1)(iii)
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Hcy Industrial Parks Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department…ITA 1899/MUM/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shah Brothers, West Singhbhum vs ACIT/DCIT, Cen Cir-1, RanchiITA 239/RAN/2026[2017-2018]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2017-2018
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ami Industries, Surendranagar vs The ITO Ward 1, SurendranagarITA 148/RJT/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026