M/S. GROUP HOUSING DEV. CORPORATION PVT. LTD,MUMBAI vs. THWE OFFICE OF DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE -5(4), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 526/MUM/2022Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 October 2022AY 2012-133 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the affidavit explaining the delay was not filed by an authorized person of the assessee company. The status of the signatory differed between the appeal form and the affidavit, and it was unclear how the signatory was authorized to represent the company after directors' resignations.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT with a significant delay of 862 days. The affidavit explaining the delay was filed by a shareholder, not an authorized director of the assessee company.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal was properly explained by an authorized representative of the assessee company.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 147

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC‘ BENCH

Before: SHRI M.BALAGANESH

For Respondent: Shri Pratap Sharma
Hearing: 27/10/2022Pronounced: 27/10/2022

आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):

1.

This appeal in A.Y.2012-13 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-53, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-53/IT-555/DCCC-5(4)/2018-19, Mumbai dated 29/08/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 19/12/2018 by the ld. DCIT, Central Circle 5(4), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

M/s. Group Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,

2.

At the outset, we find that there is a delay in filing of appeal before us by the assessee by 862 days. Defect memo pointing out the same has been duly issued by this Tribunal to the assessee. The assessee has filed an affidavit on 23/03/2022 signed by Shri Lakhminder Dayal Singh, Managing Director of M/s. Awas Developers and Constructions Pvt. Ltd., shareholder of M/s. Group Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd., (assessee herein). Effectively, the affidavit has been filed only by the shareholder of the assessee company instead of the Managing Director or the Director of the assessee company. But I find from Form No.36 filed by the assessee, the same has been signed by Shri Lakhminder Dayal Singh in the capacity of Managing Director of the assessee company. The status of Shri Lakhminder Dayal Singh differs in Form No.36 with that of an affidavit explaining the delay. I hold that only the directors of the assessee company could make any affirmation on behalf of the assessee company. Hence, I hold that the affidavit has not been filed by the authorised person of the assessee company. Accordingly, the defect memo for explaining the delay has not been rectified by the assessee. Moreover, even in the affidavit it has been mentioned that all the Directors of the assessee company had resigned. Thereafter, how Shri Lakhminder Dayal Singh has been authorised to represent the assessee company by the other surviving shareholders of the assessee company has not been brought on record. Hence, even on this count, the affidavit filed by Shri Lakhminder Dayal Singh suffers from serious infirmity. Hence, I hold that the delay in filing of appeal has not been explained at all by the assessee. Accordingly, the appeal of the assessee deserves to be dismissed as not admitted.

M/s. Group Housing Development Corporation Pvt. Ltd.,

3.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as not admitted.

Order pronounced in open Court on 27/10/2022

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →