DCIT (IT) 1(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. AC NIELSEN CORPORATION, MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the GSA receipts are not taxable as FIS under Article 12(4) of the India-USA DTAA because the services provided did not 'make available' technical knowledge or skills to the Indian entities.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a US-based company, received payments from Indian entities for services rendered under a General Services Agreement (GSA). The revenue contended these payments were 'Fees for Included Services' (FIS) taxable in India.
What were the issues?
Whether payments received under a General Services Agreement constitute 'Fees for Included Services' under the India-USA DTAA, specifically if the services 'make available' technical knowledge to the recipient.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCHE (I
Before: SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, VICE- & SH. ANIKESH BANERJEE
5.4 The ld. Counsel fully relied on the order of the Coordinate Bench of assessee‟s own case in case of date of order 22.05.2019. The relevant para 20 to 22 is extracted below: “20. In view of the above factual and legal discussions, we hold that the assessing officer erred in taxing the service agreement receipt as „fee for included services‟ as per Article 12(4) of India USA DTAA for such services as mentioned in para 4 (supra), in absence of clause in the service agreement dated 09.01.2009, that the recipient would be able to perform these services of its own without any further assistance of the assessee.
The ratio of decision of Cochin Tribunal in M/s US Technology Resources Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT (supra) relied by Id. DR for the revenue is not helpful to the revenue. In the said case the assessee rendering the services in the field of management decision making. Further, in the said case it was clearly held the expertise and technology was made available by USA company was a technical services within meaning of Article 12(4)(b) of India-USA DTAA.
In the result, the ground No. 2 of the appeal is allowed.” to 162/Mum/2022 12 Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2009-10
Considering the above fact, it is clear that the activities of the assessee is related to the GSA which the assessee was entered in agreement on 02.06.2003. The GSA receipts are not taxable under Article 12(4) of India-USA DTAA. From the memorandum of understanding, it is, obvious that as provided in clause 4B of Article 12 of the India-USA DTAA, that if the technical and consulting services made available are technical knowledge, experience, skill, know howor process orconsistthe development and transfer of a technical plan or technical design are considered to be technical or consultancy services. 6.1 It is also clarified that consultancy services not of technical nature cannot fall under “Included Services”. In view of this memorandum of understanding between two sovereign countries, the consultancy services which are technical in nature alleging to be included as technical and consultancy services for the purpose fees for included service as per sub-clause 4B of Article 12 of DTAA between India –USA. The services provided by the assessee consist of. i) Development and determination of short-term business strategies. ii) Overall management and co-ordination in relation to general policies and strategies per country perdivision. to 162/Mum/2022 13 Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2009-10 iii) Maintenance of external relationship, to the extent that these services do not compromise shareholder services. iv) Humanresource services regarding group policy. v) Legal consultant services. vi) Insurance services. vii) Development, control and maintenance of management information systems; viii) Administrative support to group companies, including analysis of management information; ix) Development of short term and long-term IT policies and strategies; x) Management and co-ordination of IT policies between group companies. xi Tax invoices; xii Financial risk management services, to the extent these services donot compromise financing services; xiii Support in the area of international staffing career development and international job rotation; xiv Market research, target research and competitor research; and stock-based compensation.
We have noted that while undertaking the above services, the assessee had not executed any contract to make anybusiness. So, as to use services to 162/Mum/2022 14 Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2009-10 independently by applying the technology. All the services undertaken by the assessee or either support service IT enable services; co-ordination of tax services as rendered above are not stage which request transfer of technology receipts to skill company. We are fully relied on the order of the coordinate bench in this issue and the addition amount of Rs.15,06,52,986/- are liable to be deleted. All other appeals are mutatis mutandis factually similar with ITA No. 160/Mum/2022.
In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue bearing to 162/Mum/2022 are dismissed.
More judgments on Section 9(1)(vii)
- Mitsubishi Electric Europe B.V., Netherlands vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, New…ITA 1948/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1697/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
- Sabre Marketing Nederland, Bv., Netherlands vs ACIT, Circle-3(1)(2), Int. Tax., New DelhiITA 1696/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 8… vs Aquapharm Chemicals Pvt. Ltd., PuneITA 2150/PUN/2024[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- Anisha Busa vs. Sibar Institute Of Dental SciencesAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026