SANTOSH DEVI GUPTA,NEW DELHI vs. ITO WARD - 40(5), NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, subject to the condition that if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme, the assessee can seek reinstitution of the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT. Subsequently, the assessee opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme and filed the necessary declarations. The Revenue had no objection to the withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal due to opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SH. ANIL CHATURVEDISmt. Santosh Devi Gupta
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘SMC-1’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (Assessment Year : 2011-12) Smt. Santosh Devi Gupta Vs. ITO B-301, 1st Floor, Ward – 40(5), Lok Vihar Pitampura, New Delhi Shakarpur Basti, New Delhi – 110 034 PAN : AFTPG 5414 J (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Shri Kshitiz Garg, Advocate Revenue by Shri Om Prakash, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing: 11.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement: 11.11.2021 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03.07.2019 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-14, New Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2011-12.
Before me, assessee has moved an application dated 26.10.2021 wherein the assessee has stated that it has opted for Vivad Se Vishwas (VSV) 2020 and has filed the declaration (Form- 1) and undertaking (Form-2) Scheme and department had issued Form-3. The assessee therefore seeks to withdraw the appeal, to which the Revenue has no objection.
After considering the request made by the assessee, I dismiss the appeal of assessee as withdrawn subject to a caveat that in case the dispute relating to tax arrears for the captioned assessment year is not ultimately resolved in terms of the aforesaid Act, the assessee shall be at liberty to approach the Tribunal for reinstitution of the appeal and the Tribunal shall consider such application appropriately as per law. With these directions, appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 11.11.2021, immediately after conclusion of the hearing of the matter in virtual mode.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026