ARTEMIS EDUCATION & RESEARCH FOUNDATION,GURGAON vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT erred in rejecting the applications. It reasoned that the trust had multiple charitable objects beyond just medical research and that potential commercial implications should be examined during assessment proceedings, not at the stage of registration.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Artemis Education & Research Foundation, applied for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT (Exemptions) rejected the applications, citing that medical research is not covered under 'education' and that the trust's objects might be commercial in nature.
What were the issues?
Whether medical research qualifies as a charitable activity for registration under Section 12AA and approval under Section 80G, and whether potential commercial benefits can be grounds for rejection at the registration stage.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT323 citing101 ITR 234 · 1975 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce167 citing55 ITR 722 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT (E) v. Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority23 citing395 ITR 18 · 2017 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA & SHRI KULDIP SINGH
PER KULDIP SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER :
Since common questions of facts and law have been raised
in both the inter-connected appeals, the same are being disposed
off by way of consolidated order to avoid repetition of discussion.
Appellant, Artemis Education & Research Foundation,
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the applicant’) by filing the present
appeals being ITA Nos.7425/Del/2017 & 8/Del/2021 sought to set
aside the impugned orders dated 20.09.2017 & 29.09.2017
2 ITA No.7475/Del./2017 ITA No.8/Del./2021 respectively passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax
(Exemptions), Chandigarh on the grounds inter alia that :-
“ITA No.7425/Del/2017
The learned CIT went wrong in rejecting the appl
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026