AVIVA INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD,MUMBAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1),INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal granted the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal. This withdrawal was to facilitate compliance with the conditions prescribed under the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 and related rules.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the AO's determination of income. Subsequently, the AO passed a rectification order granting credit for TDS, making the appeal infructuous.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal has become infructuous due to subsequent rectification and if the assessee should be permitted to withdraw the appeal to comply with new legislative provisions.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘A’ NEW DLEHI
Before: SHRI ANIL CHATURVEDI & SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY
Aggrieved by the order dated 30/10/2018 in Appeal No. 07/2018- 19/CIT (A)-42, passed by the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-42, New Delhi (“Ld. CIT(A)”) for the assessment year 2009-10 in the case of M/s Aviva international holding Ltd (“the assessee”) whereby the Ld. CIT(A) upheld the determination of income of the assessee at Rs. 7, 15, 92, 642/- by the learned Assessing Officer.
At the outset, when the matter is called today, it is submitted on behalf of the assessee that the subsequent to the filing of the appeal, on 6/3/2019 learned Assessing Officer passed a rectification order under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) granting the credit of taxes deducted at source to the tune of Rs. 7,15, 92,643/-by which the appeal had become infructuous. It is further submitted that the assessee claimed the relief granted wide Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, 2021 and accordingly submitted undertaking in form No. 1alongwith the prescribed Annexures and documents as prescribed therein before the Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi on 12/11/2021 and the same was accepted by granting certificate in form No. 2 dated 26/11/2021. It is further submitted by the Ld. AR that under rule 11 UE (2) read with rule 11 UF (3) of the Rules, the assessee is required to irrevocablyto withdraw, terminate, or discontinue all the appeals against the relevant order and give intimation to this effect by filing form No. 3, within 60 days from the date of issuance of form No. 2.
In the circumstances, Ld. AR submitted that the assessee is desiring to withdraw irrevocably, and without prejudice basis, the appeal in order to comply with the requirement of law and prayed to permit the assessee to withdraw the same.
Ld. DR reports no objection to grant such permission, and the same is recorded.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the prayer of the assessee is granted and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn to facilitate the assessee to comply with the conditions prescribed under rule 11UE of the Income Tax (31st amendment) rules, 2021 read with the taxation laws (amendment) act, 2021. Order pronounced on this the 21st day of December, 2021 in open court immediately on conclusion of hearing or virtual mode.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026