MAHESH CHAND GOYAL,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-6, NEW DELHI
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted to settle the appeals under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. Both parties agreed to treat the appeals as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed appeals against additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) for undisclosed interest income. The appeals were filed for assessment years 2013-14 and 2014-15.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of undisclosed interest income was beyond the scope of Section 153A and if the reasons for the addition were erroneous.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
off through this Consolidated Order. Grounds taken in these appeals of Assessee are as under: .-1775/De/2018 and 1776/Del/2018. Sh. Mahesh Chand Goyal
ITA No:- 1775/Del/2018
On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the addition of Rs.3750000/- made by the assessing officer and confirmed by CIT(A) is beyond the scope of provisions of section 153A of the Act and therefore, the addition of Rs.3750000/- is liable to be deleted.
2. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of Rs.3750000/- made by the assessing officer on account of alleged undisclosed interest income. 3. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the alleged reasons given by the assessing officer and CIT(A) for making / confirming addition of Rs. 3750000/- are erroneous and, therefore, the addition of Rs.3750000/- is liable to be deleted. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify or delete one or more ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing of appeal. The aforesaid grounds of appeal are without prejudice of each other.
ITA No:- 1776/Del/2018
1. On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the CIT(A) erred in confirming addition of Rs.3750000/- made by the assessing officer on account of alleged undisclosed interest income.
On the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the alleged reasons given by the assessing officer and CIT(A) for making / confirming addition of Rs. 3750000/- are erroneous and, therefore, the addition of Rs.3750000/- is liable to be deleted. The appellant craves leave to add, alter, modify or delete one or more ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing of appeal. The aforesaid grounds of appeal are without prejudice of each other.
(B) At the time of hearing, at the outset, the learned Counsel for the Assessee informed us that the assessee has opted to settle the aforementioned appeals under Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 (“VSVS”, for short) and that the assessee has already filed the relevant forms. The Ld. Counsel for assessee also drew our attention to letter filed in Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“ITAT”, for short) giving intimation for the same, and requesting to withdraw both these appeals. Page 2 of 5 .-1775/De/2018 and 1776/Del/2018. Sh. Mahesh Chand Goyal (B.1) At the time of hearing before us, the Ld. Counsel for assessee as well as the learned Senior Departmental Representative (“Ld. Sr. DR”, for short) submitted before us that these appeals may be treated as withdrawn and may be dismissed on account of the aforesaid VSVS. After due consideration, and in view of the foregoing; and as both sides have agreed to this; we are of the view that both these appeals have become infructuous, and we treat these appeals as withdrawn on account of the aforesaid VSVS. Accordingly, these appeals having become infructuous, are hereby dismissed as withdrawn, subject to settlement of the disputes in the appeals under the aforesaid VSVS.
(C) Before we part, we hereby clarify, by way of abundant caution, that if for some reason the disputes under these appeals before us are not settled under the aforesaid VSVS, then the assessee will be at liberty to approach ITAT for restoration of these appeals, in accordance with law.
(D) In the result, these appeals are dismissed.
This order has been already pronounced on22nd December, 2021 in Open Court, in the presence of Representatives of both sides; after conclusion of the hearing.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026