DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRE-CIRCLE-6(4), MUMBAI vs. SHRI RAJIV RATAN, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) was justified in deleting the addition. The Indiabulls Group had already approached the Income Tax Settlement Commission and offered income related to these transactions, and the AO failed to demonstrate that the impugned amount was not included in the settlement.
What were the facts?
During a search in the Indiabulls Group, an Excel sheet was found containing records of unaccounted cash transactions, some of which were linked to 'RR P' (Shri Rajiv Rattan). The Assessing Officer (AO) added Rs. 20.63 crores as unaccounted income to the assessee's income based on these records.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO was justified in adding unaccounted cash receipts to the assessee's income when the transactions were part of a settlement application filed by a group, and whether the CIT(A) erred in relying on the settlement commission's order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI AMARJIT SINGHShri Rajiv Rattan Smt. Riddhi Mishra
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per Amarjit Singh (AM): The present appeal and cross objection filed by the revenue are directed against the order passed by the ld. CIT(A)-54, Mumbai, dated 09.12.2021 for A.Y. 2011-12. The revenue has raised the following grounds before us:
“1 On the facts and in
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026