VIJAY RADHESHYAM NYATI HUF,DHAR vs. ITO, DHAR

ITA 704/IND/2018Status: DisposedITAT Indore25 May 202144 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the assessees had discharged their onus by establishing the genuineness of the share transactions and satisfying the conditions for exemption. The Tribunal found that the company 'Sunrise Asian Limited' was neither a penny stock nor a paper company.

What were the facts?

The assessees claimed exemption for Long Term Capital Gains (LTCG) on sale of shares under Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) disallowed these claims, treating the gains as income from undisclosed sources, primarily based on statements from an investigation wing report.

What were the issues?

Whether LTCG on sale of shares claimed as exempt under Section 10(38) is valid when additions were made based on investigation reports without sufficient evidence and opportunity for cross-examination.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10(38),Section 68

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

अपील"य अ"धकरण, इ"दौर "यायपीठ, इ"दौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL INDORE BENCH, INDORE

BEFORE HON'BLE MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND HON'BLE MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year:2014-15 Kumari Ayushi Nyati ITO, 5(5) 10, Balaji Vihar, 1-2, Maa Durg Indore बनाम/ Nagar, Navlakha Main Road 1 to Vs. 7, Indore (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.AJPPN2679C Assessment Year:2014-15 Smt. Vijaya Nyati, ITO, Dhar 5 Nyati House, Mandi Road बनाम/ Dhammod, Dist: Dhar M.P. Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.AAPPN8302B Assessment Year:2014-15 Shri Vijay Kumar Radheshyam ITO, Dhar Nyati, HUF बनाम/ 5 Nyati House, Mandi Road Vs. Dhammod, Dist: Dhar M.P. (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.AACHV4415Q

Kumari Ayushi Nyati & others ITA Nos.203/Ind/2019,703 to 705/Ind/2018, & 488/Ind/2019 Assessment Year:2014-15 Shri Manish Kumar Radheshyam ITO, Dhar Nyati, HUF बनाम/ 5 Nyati House, Mandi Road Vs. Dhammod, Dist: Dhar M.P. (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.AACHN2172G Assessment Year:2014-15 Smt. Mamta Nyati, ITO, Dhar 5 Nyati House, Mandi Road बनाम/ Dhammod, Dist: Dhar M.P. Vs. (Appellant) (Revenue ) P.A. No.ASEPN7014R

Appellant by Shri Maneesh Vaidya & Miss Preeti, Patwa, ARs Revenue by Sh

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 10(38)

All 3,113 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10(38) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →