COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S ABHUINANDAN INVESTMENTS LT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the ITAT's decision was erroneous. It found that the transaction of receiving shares of an amalgamated company in lieu of shares of an amalgamating company constitutes a taxable event, irrespective of whether the shares were held as capital asset or stock-in-trade.
What were the facts?
The assessee received shares of an amalgamated company in lieu of shares of an amalgamating company. The Assessing Officer taxed this as business income, considering it a transfer. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, holding no profit accrues upon receipt of shares of the amalgamated company.
What were the issues?
Whether the receipt of shares of an amalgamated company in lieu of shares of an amalgamating company is a transfer and taxable. Whether the ITAT erred by not adjudicating the nature of shareholding (capital asset vs. stock-in-trade).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 47(vii),Section 260A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Chainrup Sampatram v. CIT196 citing24 ITR 481 · 1953 · SC · Read judgment
- Venkataswami Naidu & Co. v. CIT133 citing35 ITR 594 · 1959 · SC
- CIT v. Grace Collis58 citing248 ITR 323 · 2001 · SC · Read judgment
- Vania Silk Mills (P.) Ltd. v. CIT38 citing191 ITR 647 · 1991 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Rasiklal Maneklal (HUF)14 citing177 ITR 198 · 1989 · SC
- Orient Trading Co. Ltd. v. CIT14 citing224 ITR 371 · 1997 · SC
- Hindustan Lever v. State of Maharashtra11 citing9 SCC 438 · 2004
- Raja Mohan Raja Bahadur v. CIT7 citing66 ITR 378 · 1967 · Read judgment
ITA 822/2005 & connected matters * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 02.07.2020 Pronounced on: 07.08.2020
+ ITA 822/2005 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V, NEW DELHI
..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sunil Agarwal, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Tushar Gupta, Junior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department.
versus
M/S NALWA INVESTMENT LTD.
..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Kavita Jha, Advocate.
+ ITA 853/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Deepak Anand, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr.Vipul Agarwal, Junior Standing Counsel.
versus
M/S ABHUINANDAN INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Ajay Vohra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Kavita Jha, Advocate.
+ ITA 935/2005 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Ajit Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms.Adeeba Mujabhid, Junior Standing Counsel.
2
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026