COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BIOSEED RESEARCH (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that interest under Sections 234B and 234C should be charged after the MAT credit is set off against the tax payable. Consequently, rectification under Section 154 was not permissible as the issue was debatable.
What were the facts?
The appeals concerned the calculation of interest under Sections 234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act, specifically whether MAT credit should be set off before or after computing this interest. The revenue argued that amendments to the Act were prospective, and prior to these, interest was calculated before MAT credit set-off.
What were the issues?
Whether MAT credit should be set off before or after computing interest under Sections 234B and 234C, and whether this issue was debatable for the purpose of Section 154 rectification.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(20)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.2,664 citing77 ITR 518 · 1973 · SC
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing131 ITR 597 · 1981 · SC
- CIT v. Anjum M.H. Ghaswala452 citing252 ITR 1 · 2001 · SC
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CIT398 citing224 ITR 677 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Allied Motors (supra); CIT v. Podar Cement Pvt Ltd.244 citing226 ITR 625 · 1997 · SC
- CIT v. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt. Ltd.229 citing304 ITR 308 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Atlas Cycle Industries212 citing180 ITR 319 · 1989 · HC
- CIT v. J.H. Gotla176 citing156 ITR 323 · 1985 · SC
- Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain147 citing259 ITR 449 · 2003 · SC
- Sandvik Asia Ltd. v. CIT96 citing280 ITR 643 · 2006 · SC · Read judgment
- Dr. Prannoy Roy v. Commissioner of Income-tax61 citing254 ITR 755 · 2002 · HC
- Allied Motors v. CIT59 citing297 ITR 322 · 2008 · SC
- CIT v. Kotak Mahendra Finance Ltd.59 citing265 ITR 119 · 2004 · HC
- UOI v. Onkar S. Kanwar34 citing258 ITR 761 · 2002 · SC
- CWS (India) Ltd. v. CIT33 citing208 ITR 649 · 1994 · SC
- CIT v. Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd.32 citing253 ITR 791 · 2018 · HC · Read judgment
- Chemplast Sanmar Ltd. v. DCIT29 citing92 ITD 441 · 2004 · ITAT
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. Xpro India Ltd.29 citing300 ITR 337 · HC
- 230 ITR 5428 citing230 ITR 54
- 28 citing
* THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment delivered on 06.02.2009
+ ITA 402/2005
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX … Appellant
- versus –
M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LIMITED
... Respondent
WITH
+ ITA 1474/2006
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX … Appellant
- versus –
M/S NESTLE INDIA LIMITED
... Respondent
AND + ITA 708/2007
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX … Appellant
- versus –
BRIJBASI ART PRESS LIMITED
... Respondent
WITH + ITA 719/2007 2009:DHC:390-DB
- versus –
BIOSEED RESEARCH (INDIA) PVT LTD ... Respondent
AND + ITA 791/2007
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX … Appellant
- versus –
ALLIED STRIPS LIMITED
... Respondent
AND + ITA 829/2007
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX … Appellant
- versus –
CONTINENTAL PACKAGING PVT. LIMITED ... Respondent
AND + ITA 907/2007
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V … Appellant
- versus –
NIS SPARTA LIMITED
... Respondent
AND + ITA 914/2007
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-V … Appellant
- versus –
2009:DHC:390-DB
AND + ITA 969/2007
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026