CIT vs. DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES

ITA - 392 / 2012HC Delhi29 November 20128 pages
For Petitioner: NP SAHNI
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the Tribunal's decision regarding the allowance of interest deduction was based on factual analysis and not perverse. It also upheld the Tribunal's view that reassessment proceedings were unwarranted for certain assessment years.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed ITAT's order quashing reassessment proceedings and allowing deductions for interest on borrowed capital for construction. The assessee, a firm, had constructed a building using a loan and claimed interest expenses as a deduction.

What were the issues?

The key issues were the correctness of quashing reassessment proceedings and the taxability of interest payments claimed as deductions for property income.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 24(b),Section 45(4),Section 263

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Page 1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Decided on 29.11.2012

+ ITA 392/2012, C.M. APPL. 11592/2012 & 11593/2012 + ITA 393/2012, C.M. APPL. 11594/2012 & 11595/2012 + ITA 403/2012, C.M. APPL. 11602/2012 & 11603/2012 + ITA 420/2012, C.M. APPL. 11630/2012 + ITA 428/2012, C.M. APPL. 12332/2012 & 12333/2012

CIT

..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel.

versus

DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Anil Sharma, Advocates and Sh. Ravi Pratap Mall, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR

MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT)

1.

The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 31.10.2011 for the Assessment Years 2002-03 and ITA No. 2303/Del/2010 of the Revenue for the 2012:DHC:7105-DB Page 2

Assessment Year 2005-06. The question of law sought to be urged is as to

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →