CIT vs. DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the ITAT's findings on the allowability of interest expenses were based on factual analysis and not perverse. It also upheld the ITAT's decision to quash reassessment proceedings for certain assessment years, citing previous High Court judgments on the matter.
What were the facts?
The Revenue challenged the ITAT's order quashing reassessment proceedings and allowing deductions for interest on borrowed capital for property construction. The assessee, a firm, had constructed a building and claimed interest expenses, which were disallowed by the Assessing Officer. The ITAT allowed the deduction, finding sufficient evidence in the balance sheets.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the correctness of the Tribunal's order quashing reassessment proceedings and the taxability of interest payments claimed as deductions for property construction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(1),Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 148,Section 24(b),Section 45(4),Section 263
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Page 1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Decided on 29.11.2012
+ ITA 392/2012, C.M. APPL. 11592/2012 & 11593/2012 + ITA 393/2012, C.M. APPL. 11594/2012 & 11595/2012 + ITA 403/2012, C.M. APPL. 11602/2012 & 11603/2012 + ITA 420/2012, C.M. APPL. 11630/2012 + ITA 428/2012, C.M. APPL. 12332/2012 & 12333/2012
CIT
..... Appellant Through : Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sr. Standing Counsel.
versus
DELHI INDUSTRIES & ENTERPRISES ..... Respondent Through : Sh. Salil Aggarwal, Sh. Anil Sharma, Advocates and Sh. Ravi Pratap Mall, Advocates CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR
MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT (OPEN COURT)
The Revenue claims to be aggrieved by the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) dated 31.10.2011 for the Assessment Years 2002-03 and ITA No. 2303/Del/2010 of the Revenue for the 2012:DHC:7106-DB Page 2
Assessment Year 2005-06. The question of law sought to be urged is as to
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026