COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTR

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 109 / 2001HC Delhi31 October 20123 pages
For Petitioner: JOHN BARA
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court decided that the present appeals should be disposed of in accordance with the judgment in a previously decided related case. The outcome of the appeals is therefore contingent on that prior ruling.

What were the facts?

These appeals by the Commissioner of Income Tax were disposed of in view of a separate judgment passed in a related case. The specific facts of these appeals are not detailed in this excerpt.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the application of a prior judgment to these appeals. The specific legal questions addressed in the prior judgment are not evident from this text.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

ITA 56,57,105, 107,109,114,177/01, 88/02 111, 321,498/03,227,336,529,690/04,212/05 Page 1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

RESERVED ON :11.10.2012

PRONOUNCED ON:31.10.2012

ITA 56/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUS. LTD ..... Respondent

ITA 57/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUS.LTD ..... Respondent

ITA 105/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 107/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 109/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 114/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 177/2001

COMMISSIONER OF INCOMET TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

2012:DHC:6616-DB

ITA 56,57,105, 107,109,114,177/01, 88/02 111, 321,498/03,227,336,529,690/04,212/05 Page 2

ITA 88/2002

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 111/2003

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 321/2003

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 498/2003

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 227/2004

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 336/2004

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant

versus

M/S.ANSAL PROPERTIES & INDUSTRIES LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 529/2004

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

ITA 690/2004

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

2012:DHC:6616-DB

ITA 56,57,105, 107,109,114,177/01, 88/02 111, 321,498/03,227,336,529,690/04,212/05 Page 3

ITA 212/2005

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant

versus

M/S. ANSAL HOUSING AND CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent

….Appellant Through : Sh. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms. Anshul Sharma, Advocate. ….Respondents Through : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Ms. Kavita Jha and Sh. Somnath Shukla, Advocates. Sh. Satyen Sethi and Sh. Arta Trana Panda, Advocates.

CORAM: MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT MR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR

MR. JUSTICE S.RAVINDRA BHAT 1. The present Appeals are disposed of in view of the separate judgment passed today in ITA 18/1999 titled Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s Ansal Housing Finance and Leasing Co. Ltd.

(S.RAVINDRA BHAT) JUDGE

(R.V. EASWAR) 31st October, 2012

JUDGE

2012:DHC:6616-DB

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →