GALILEO INTERNATIONAL INC vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal followed its previous order for the same assessee for earlier assessment years. The High Court disposed of these appeals in terms of that prior judgment, noting that appeals against it were pending before the Supreme Court.
What were the facts?
The Revenue and the assessee were aggrieved by ITAT orders for multiple assessment years. The Revenue's issue concerned the quantum of income attributed to India, while the assessee's issue was about its chargeability to tax for carrying on business in India.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the determination of income attributable to India and the assessee's chargeability to tax on business activities in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Not specified
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
'-~ """ $-10 to 17 * IN THE mGH COURT OF DELm AT NEW DELm + ITA 1148/2011 + ITA 1149/2011 + ITA 1150/2011 + ITA 115112011 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Anupam Tripathi, Sr. Standing Counsel. versus GALILEO INTERNATIONAL INC ..... Respondent Through: None. + ITA 466/2012 + ITA 467/2012 + ITA 46812012 + ITA 472/2012 GALl LEO INTERNATIONAL INC ..... Appellant Through: None. versus DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anupam Tripathi, Sr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RA VINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASW AR ORDER % 25.09.2012 C.M. APPL. 11112011 in ITA 114812011. C.M. APPL. 1870612011 in ITA 114912011. C.M. APPL. 1870912011 IN ITA 115012011. C.M. APPL. 14334/2012 IN ITA 46612012. C.M. APPL.1434712012 IN ITA 46712012. C.M. APPL. 1435112012 IN ITA 46812012. C.M. APPL. 1871012011 IN ITA 115112011 Exemption allowed subject all just exceptions. 2012:DHC:7855-DB
, '.~ The applications stand disposed of. CoM. APP. 1433512011 IN ITA 46612011. C.M. APPL. 1434812011 IN ITA 46712011. C.M. APPL 1435212011 IN ITA 468/2011. C.M. APPL. 1439512011 IN ITA 472/2011 For the reasons mentioned in the applications the Court is of the opinion that the delay be condoned. The applications are disposed of. ITA 114812011. ITA 114912011. ITA 115012011. ITA 115112011. TIA 46612011. ITA 46712011. ITA 46812011 & ITA 47212011 In these matters the Revenue as well as assessee are aggrieved in some parts against the orders of the ITAT for assessment years 1999-2000 and 2000-01, 2001-02 and 2002-03. The question of law sought to be urged by the Revenue relates to the determination of the quantum of income attributed to India in respect of the assessee; the question of law sought to be urged by the assessee pertains to its chargeability to tax on the ground that it carries on business activities in India. The Tribunal followed the previous order made by it in respect of the present assessee for the years 1995-96 to 1998-99. The appeals against that order were disposed of by a common judgment dated 25.02.2009 in ITA 1048/2008, 1049/2008, 1050/2008, 105112008, 1052/2008, 1053/2008, 1054/2008 & 1055/2008 and connected cases. It is not in dispute that appeals are pending by special leave before the Supreme Court against the judgment dated 25.02.2009, in Special Leave Petition No.3562112009 and 25628/2008. The factual matrix being the same and the questions of law also being identical this Court disposes of these appeals in terms of the said judgment dated 25.02.2009. s. RA VINDRA BRAT, J L4~. R. V.EASW AR, J -, 2012:DHC:7855-DB
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026