M/S COAL INDIA LTD. vs. COMMR.OF CUSTOMS(PORT) KOLKATA
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that the services rendered by the Indian agent were directly relatable to the import of goods and constituted product support services. These services were includable in the assessable value of the imported goods.
What were the facts?
M/s. Coal India Limited imported spare parts for P&H Shovel. A local agent, M/s. Voltas Limited, provided engineering and technical services for which a fee was payable. Customs authorities sought to include these service fees in the assessable value of the imported goods.
What were the issues?
Whether engineering and technical service fees paid to a local agent for product support services are includable in the assessable value of imported goods under the Customs Act and Valuation Rules.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14(1), Section 14(1A), Rule 9(1)(e)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CIT398 citing3 SCC 472 · 1997 · Read judgment
- Collector of Customs (Preventive) v. Essar Gujarat Ltd.6 citing9 SCC 738 · 1997
- 5 citing
- 4 citing
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
J U D G M E N T
UJJAL BHUYAN, J.
This is an appeal under Section 130E of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order dated 20.04.2010 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata in appeal No.CDM-164/2004. 2. Be it stated that appellant had filed appeal No.CDM-164/2004 before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata (‘CESTAT’ for short 2
hereinafter) assailing the order dated 21.06.2004 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Kolkata confirming the order of the Assistant Commissioner of Customs and dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant.
This Court by order dated 10.09.2010 had condoned the delay and had issued notice.
Relevant facts may be briefly noted.
Appellant is a Government of India u
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026