COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALORE vs. M/S. SPICE TELECOM, BANGALORE
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that radio terminals are essential for interconnectivity in a cellular network and qualify as BTS ancillary equipment. Therefore, they are eligible for the exemption under the notification.
What were the facts?
The respondent imported Radio Terminals and sought exemption from customs duty under Notification No. 11/97-Cus, as amended. The customs authorities initially rejected the claim, holding that radio terminals were not BTS ancillary equipment.
What were the issues?
Whether imported radio terminals qualify as 'BTS ancillary equipment' for customs duty exemption. Interpretation of the term 'ancillary' in the context of telecommunication equipment.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 25(1) of the Customs Act, 1962
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T BHAN, J. The question that arises in the present appeal is whether Radio Terminals imported by the respondent-assessee (for short the Respondent) should be considered as ’Base Transceivers Station (BTS) ancillary equipment’ in order to be given the benefit of exemption Notification No. 11/97-Cus. Dated 1.3.1997, as amended by Notification No. 51/97 dated 2.6.1997. Exemption Notification and its relevant entries :
The Central Government in exercise of powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 issued a notification No. 11/97 dated 01.03.1997 in public interest to exempt certain goods mentioned in the table of the notification read with relevant list appended thereto from payment of duty imported into India either in entirety or partially. Notification No. 11/97 was amended by Notification No. 51/97 on 2.6.1997 to include cert
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026