JAIN SPINNERS LTD. vs. COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
C.A. No.-003829-003829 - 1996Supreme Court05 December 19971 pages
No AI summary yet for this judgment.
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 1
PETITIONER:
JAIN SPINNERS LED.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/12/1997
BENCH:
CJI, B.N. KIRPAL
ACT:
HEADNOTE:
JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T Verma, CJI.
In the present case the fact that certified copy of the order dated 13.04.92 passed by the Assistant Collector was applied by the appellant no 9.5.93, is of no consequence. As mentioned in the Tribunal’s order it was not in dispute that the order dated 13.04.92 was served upon the appellants herein on 20.04.92 by delivery of the same to the counsel for the appellants in the High Court. That being so the appellants cannot claim the benefit of the exclusion of the time taken for obtaining a certified copy thereafter. The appeal filed to the Collector by the appellant was. therefore, rightly dismissed as time barred on 19.10. 95. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026