M/S. RATTAN STEEL WORKS vs. COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court accepted the appeal, set aside the orders of the High Court and CESTAT, and ordered that the appeal before CESTAT would be restored if the remaining pre-deposit was made within three weeks. Otherwise, the CESTAT's dismissal order would stand.
What were the facts?
The appellant's appeal before CESTAT was dismissed for failing to make the full pre-deposit amount. The High Court also dismissed the appellant's writ petition and subsequent appeal, though time extensions were granted. The appellant then moved the Supreme Court to deposit the remaining pre-deposit.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be restored upon depositing the remaining pre-deposit amount, and the consequences of non-compliance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 2 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 426 of 2003 PETITIONER: M/s. Rattan Steel Works RESPONDENT: Commissioner of Central Excise & Anr DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/02/2008 BENCH: ASHOK BHAN & DALVEER BHANDARI JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT O R D E R I.A.NO.2 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO.426 OF 2003 Pursuant to a show cause notice dated 11th August 1998 to the appellant and the repl y having been filed by it, the Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai, imposed a duty of Rs.23,51,646/- and a penalty of Rs.5,00,000/- on the appellant-firm and Rs.1,00,000/- on its proprietor as individual penalty. On an appeal filed by the appellant, Cutoms, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (now Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal) [CESTAT], by an order dated 17th July 2000, ordered payment of Rs.10,00,000/- as pre-deposit as a condition precedent for hearing the appeal on merits within a period of three months. It was made clear that if the said amount is not deposited, the appeal filed before it shall stand dismissed. The appellant deposited only a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-. The CESTAT, however, on 19th January 2001, extended the time to deposit the amount by two months. On 28th March 2001, the CESTAT dismissed the appeal for non-compliance of the order of pre-deposit. I.A.No.2 in C.A.No.426/03 .... (contd.) - 2 - Aggrieved by the said order, the appellant filed a writ petition before the High Co urt which was also dismissed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court on 20th September 2001. However, a period of twelve weeks was granted to deposit the remaining amount of Rs.9,00,000/-. The appellant filed an appeal before a Division Bench of the High Court. The Divisi on Bench, by the impugned order, dismissed the appeal, but, granted two weeks’ time to deposit the amount of pre-deposit. Against the said order, the appellant filed an appeal before this Court by way of Special Leave Petition wherein leave has been granted and the appeal is pending. The appellant has now moved the present application for permitting the appellant to deposit the remaining amount of pre-deposit, as ordered by the CESTAT so that the appeal before the CESTAT is restored and heard. Counsel for the appellant-applicant submits that the remaining amount of pre-deposit
will be deposited within three weeks. In view of this statement, we accept this appeal and set aside the orders of the Division Bench of the High Court, learned Single Judge of the High Court as also that of the CESTAT and order that if the aforementioned remaining amount of Rs.9,00,000/- is deposited within the said period, the appeal before the CESTAT shall stand restored and disposed of on I.A.No.2 in C.A.No.426/03 .... (contd.) - 3 - merits. However, in case the appellant-applicant fails to deposit the said amount, the
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 2 of 2 order passed by the CESTAT dismissing the appeal of the appellant shall remain in force and consequently the present appeal shall also stand dismissed. In view of the above, I.A.No.2 as also the civil appeal are disposed of.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026