COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, NEW DELHI vs. LIFELONG APPLIANCES LTD

PDF · subscribers
C.A. No.-005660-005660 - 2000Supreme Court09 March 20061 pages
For Petitioner: P. PARMESWARANFor Respondent: M. P. DEVANATH

No AI summary yet for this judgment.

Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 1 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 5660 of 2000 PETITIONER: Commr. of Central Excise, New Delhi RESPONDENT: Lifelong Appliances Ltd. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/03/2006 BENCH: Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & Dalveer Bhandari

JUDGMENT: JUDGMENT ORDER Heard the learned senior counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the respondent. We have perused the order impugned in this appeal. The Tribunal as a matter of fact held that the appellant has satisfied the requirement of not taking Modvat credit on the inputs used in the manufacture of exempted goods and therefore their case is specifically covered by Rule 57-CC as well as the decision in Chandrapur Magnet Wires (P) Ltd. v. Collector of C. Excise, Nagpur, reported in (1996) 81 ELT 3 SC with regard to not availing Modvat credit on inputs. The impugned order, therefore, is not liable to be interfered with at the instance of the Revenue. The appeal fails and stands dismissed. No costs.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →