COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR&ORS. vs. SOCIETY FOR THE PROMN.OF EDN.,ALLAHABAD
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court clarified that the registration of the application under Section 12AA would take effect six months after the date of application, i.e., from August 24, 2003. All other legal questions were left open.
What were the facts?
The case concerns the deemed registration of an application under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The respondent's application was made on February 24, 2003.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the interpretation of deemed registration of an application under Section 12AA when no response is received within six months. The court addressed the effective date of such registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Page 1 JUDGMENT 1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1478 of 2016 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 9705 OF 2009] COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KANPUR & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS SOCIETY FOR THE PROMN.OF EDN., ALLAHABAD Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T KURIAN, J.
Leave granted. 2. There is no appearance on behalf of the sole respondent despite service of notice and adjournment sought for on a couple of occasions earlier. 3. The short issue is with regard to the deemed registration of an application under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act. The High Court has taken the view that once an application is made under the said provision and in case the same is not responded to within six months, it would be taken that the application is registered under the provision. 4. The learned Additional Solicitor General appearing for the appellants, has raised an apprehension that in the case of the respondent, since the date of application was of 24.02.2003, at the worst, the same would operate only after six months from the date of the application.
Page 2 JUDGMENT 2 5. We see no basis for such an apprehension since that is the only logical sense in which the Judgment could be understood. Therefore, in order to disabuse any apprehension, we make it clear that the registration of the application under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act in the case of the respondent shall take effect from 24.08.2003. 6. Subject to the above clarification and leaving all other questions of law open, the appeal is disposed of with no order as to costs. .......................J.
[ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J.
[ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ] New Delhi; February 16, 2016.
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026