COMMNR. OF CUSTOMS, CHENNAI vs. M/S. PENTAMEDIA GRAPHICS LTD
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Tribunal held that the imported files qualified as 'information technology software' under the amended notification, as they were machine-readable data capable of manipulation. The Supreme Court agreed, stating that the requirement of another software to process them did not negate their status as software.
What were the facts?
The assessee imported 'Motion Capture Animation Files' and claimed exemption from customs duty under a notification for 'information technology software'. The revenue authorities denied the exemption, arguing the files were mere data and not software capable of manipulation.
What were the issues?
Whether 'Motion Capture Animation Files' constitute 'information technology software' eligible for customs duty exemption. Whether data requiring another software for processing can still be classified as software.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Customs Notification No. 20/99-Cus
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T BHAN, J.
The issue involved in the present case is: Whether the imported goods, i.e. ’Motion Capture Animation Files’ will come under the purview of Customs Notification No. 29/99 as ’information technology software’ for claiming exemption from payment of duty? Respondent/assessee (for short "the Respondent") imported ’Motion Capture Animation Files’ valued at Rs. 7,02,58,125/- and classified them under heading 85.24 and claimed exemption from payment of customs duty under Notification No. 20/99-Cus. It will be convenient to refer to the relevant portion of the notification: "85.24 - (i) Information technology software, and (ii) Document of title conveying the right to use Information Technology software.
Explanation:- "information technology Software ’ means any representation of instructions, data, sound or image including source code and object code, recorded in a machine readable fo
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026