ASSAM TEXT BOOK PRODUN.& PUBN.CORP.LTD. vs. COMMR.OF INCOME TAX,GAUHATI
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that the High Court failed to consider crucial aspects like the historical background, funding, shareholding, and CBDT circulars granting similar exemptions. The Court found that the High Court's decision was not based on a comprehensive review of relevant factors.
What were the facts?
The Assam State Text Book Production and Publication Corporation Limited, a government company, sought exemption under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act for its income from publishing and selling textbooks. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied the exemption, but the ITAT majority allowed it.
What were the issues?
Whether the Corporation qualifies as an 'Educational Institution' for exemption under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, considering its nature as a government company and its profit-making activities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cause title — parties, addresses and appearances
O R D E R Heard learned counsel on both sides.
Appellant-Corporation [Assessee] was initially constituted as `Central Text Book Committee', which was attached to the office of the Director of Public Instruction. In 1950, the name was changed to `Assam Text Book Committee' with ten members nominated by the State Government. In the year 1968, the Government re- constituted the said Committee as `Board of Text Book Production and Research'. The said Board was converted into Corporation in 1972 and the name was changed to `Assam State Text Book Production and Publication Corporation Limited' vide Notification dated 26th July, 1972 [for short, “the Corporation”]. All the assets of the said Board stood transferred to the Corporation with effect from 1st July, 1972. The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(22)
- DCIT(Exemptions)-1(1), Mumbai vs Indian Institute of Banking and Finance…ITA 3394/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT(Exemptions)-1(1), Mumbai vs Indian Institute of Banking and Finance…ITA 3393/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT(Exemptions)-1(1), Mumbai vs Indian Institute of Banking and Finance…ITA 3392/MUM/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- DCIT(Exemptions)-1(1), Mumbai vs Indian Institute of Banking and Finance…ITA 3391/MUM/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2015-16
- DCIT(Exemptions)-1(1), Mumbai vs Indian Institute of Banking and Finance…ITA 3390/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026