VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD. vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court allowed the applications for withdrawal of the civil appeals. The appeals were disposed of as withdrawn, with no order as to costs.
What were the facts?
The appellant, Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., filed applications seeking to withdraw several civil appeals. The Revenue did not oppose these applications.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appellant should be granted liberty to withdraw their pending civil appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. No.64307 of 2021 In Civil Appeal Nos.1045-1052 of 2011 VODAFONE ESSAR CELLULAR LTD. Appellant VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COCHIN Respondent WITH I.A. No.64291 of 2021 In C.A. No.10676/2013. I.A. No.64512 of 2021 in C.A. Nos.10674-10675/2013
I.A. Nos.64951 and 64954 of 2021 in C.A. No.1202/2011 I.A. Nos.64961 and 64963 of 2021 in C.A. No.1203/2011 O R D E R I.A. No.64951 of 2021 in C.A. No.1202 of 2011 and I.A. No.64961 of 2021 in C.A. No.1203 of 2011 seeking change in the name of the applicant/appellant and appropriate amendment to the cause title are allowed. I.A. No.64307 of 2021 in Civil Appeal Nos.1045-1052 of 2011; I.A. No.64291 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No.10676/2013; I.A. No.64512 of 2021 in Civil Appeal Nos.10674-10675/2013; I.A. No. 64954 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No.1202 of 2011; and I.A. No.64963 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No.1203 of 2011 have been preferred by the applicants/appellants seeking liberty Digitally signed by Dr. Mukesh Nasa Date: 2021.10.06 15:55:33 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified
2 to withdraw the instant appeals for the reasons indicated in the applications. The applications are not opposed by the learned counsel for the Revenue. Consequently, the applications seeking withdrawal are allowed. The civil appeals stand disposed of as having been withdrawn for the reasons mentioned in the respective applications, with no order as to costs. ........................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) ........................J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT) ........................J. (BELA M. TRIVEDI) New Delhi, September 29, 2021.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026