KGK CREATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. CIRCLE 2(2)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to treat foreign exchange gains/losses and reversals of provisions for leave encashment and gratuity as operating items. It also held that no adjustment for overdue interest should be made if the assessee does not charge interest to its AEs or non-AEs.
What were the facts?
The assessee, KGK Creations Private Limited, appealed against an assessment order concerning transfer pricing adjustments. The primary issues involved adjustments on the sale/purchase of jewellery/diamonds and charging interest on overdue receivables from associated enterprises (AEs).
What were the issues?
Whether foreign exchange gains/losses and provision reversals are operating items for transfer pricing analysis, and whether interest adjustment is permissible on overdue receivables when no interest is charged to other parties.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C(13),Section 144B,Section 92C(1),Section 92C(2)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH ‘K’, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER KGK Creations Private Limited Juri iction Assessing Officer Gj-10, SEEPZ SEZ, Seepz S.O. Vs. (JAO) Mumbai 400096, Circle 2(2)(1), Mumbai Aayakar PAN No. AABCK0378H Bhawan, Mumbai Appellant/ assessee Respondent/ revenue Assessee represented by Shri Vijay Mehta CA / AR Department represented by Shri Kiran Unavekar SR. DR. Date of hearing 17/03/2025 Date of pronouncement 28/03/2025
Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act. PER: PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal by assessee is directed against the Assessment Order dated 25/10/2024 passed u/s. 143(3) read with Section 144C(13) read with Section 144B of the Income Tax-Act, 1961, passed in pursuance of direction of Dispute Resolution Panel-2 New Delhi(DRP) dated 18.12.2023. The Assessee has raised following grounds: 1. “Based on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellant craves leave to prefer an appeal against the order passed by the Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department National Faceless Assessment Centre ("NFAC") (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessing Offic
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C(13)
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 486/HYD/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
- Autoform Sales Gmbh, Hyderabad vs ADIT (International Taxation) - 1, HyderabadITA 498/HYD/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 4558/MUM/2023[2021-22]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026