RAKESH NATWARLAL PATEL,THANE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 23(3)(5), MUMBAI

ITA 2813/MUM/2024Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 April 2025AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI. SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE (Vice President), SHRI. GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting notional commission added by the CIT(A) and allowing the ground regarding the applicability of Section 115BBE for transactions prior to April 1, 2017. The Revenue's appeals were dismissed as the issues were already dealt with in the original assessment.

What were the facts?

The assessee, Rakesh Natwarlal Patel, appealed against additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) concerning cash deposits from bullion sales and disallowance of bad debts. The Revenue also filed cross-appeals against the CIT(A)'s deletion of certain additions made during reassessment proceedings.

What were the issues?

The primary issues were the validity of additions for unexplained cash deposits and disallowance of bad debts, and whether reassessment proceedings were justified when issues were already considered in the original assessment.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69A,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 115BBE,Section 69C

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH MUMBAI

Before: SHRI. SAKTIJIT DEY, HON’BLE & SHRI. GIRISH AGRAWAL

Hearing: 08.01.2025Pronounced: 07.04.2025

PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

Appeals in ITA No.2813/Mum/2024 filed by assessee an

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 69A

All 15,297 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →