BRAJESH RAMCHANDRA SINGH EDUCATION SOCIETY,THANE vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned a minor delay in filing the appeal. While acknowledging the assessee's non-compliance, the Tribunal noted that the Commissioner also did not properly adjudicate the application. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner rejected the application after giving two opportunities for compliance, citing non-compliance and discrepancies. The assessee challenged this order before the Tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12A by the Commissioner was justified without proper adjudication, and if not, whether the matter should be remanded.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI
Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR
Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:
This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 07.12.2024, impugned herein, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2025-26.
At the outset, it is observed that there is a delay of 3 days in filing the instant appeal. Considering inadvertent mistake qua delay, the same is condoned.
In the instant case, the Assessee by filing an application dated 31.01.2022 in form no.10A requested for approval of registration u/s 12A of the Act, which was granted in form no.10AC on dated 08.02.2022. Thereafter, the Assessee filed an application dated 10.06.2024 in Form no.10AB for regular registration u/s 12A of the Act. The application filed by the Assessee was taken into consideration by the Ld. Commissioner, while issuing first notice dated 12.07.2024 by which the Assessee was directed to comply with the notice by 29.07.2024 and the Assessee filed some details. On verification of the same, various discrepancies were noticed by the Ld. Commissioner and therefore he again issued a notice on dated 27.11.2024, by which certain query/documents were also sought for by the Ld. Commissioner on or before 4th December 2024, however, the Assessee still made no compliance. Therefore, in the constrained circumstances, the Ld. Commissioner on 07.12.2024 passed the impugned order, rejecting the application filed by the Assessee and cancelling the registration granted vide order dated 08.02.2022 u/s 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act.
The Assessee, being aggrieved, challenged the impugned order before this Tribunal.
We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. No doubt, the Ld. Commissioner, before rejecting the application filed by the Assessee, has given 02 opportunities for filing certain details/documents, however, the Assessee failed to file the same, which resulted into rejection of the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act. Admittedly, the Ld. Commissioner, in the absence of relevant reply/explanation and the documents, failed to decide the application filed by the Assessee, in its right perspective and proper manner and therefore excusing the latches of the Assessee as the Assessee admittedly in response to first notice dated 12.07.2024 had filed various documents and the second notice was issued only on finding some discrepancies in the documents filed by the Assessee and therefore in our considered view for proper and just decision of the case and substantial justice, it would be appropriate to remand the issue back to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh, however, subject to deposit of Rs.1100 in the Revenue Department under “other heads” and within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. Thus, the case is accordingly remanded to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh.
The Assessee is also directed to comply with the notices and file the relevant documents/explanation as would be needed by the Ld. Commissioner for proper adjudication of the issue involved.
In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 25.04.2025.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026