BRAJESH RAMCHANDRA SINGH EDUCATION SOCIETY,THANE vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), PUNE, PUNE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1536/MUM/2025Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai25 April 2025AY 2025-26Bench: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (Judicial Member), SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR (Accountant Member)4 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned a minor delay in filing the appeal. While acknowledging the assessee's non-compliance, the Tribunal noted that the Commissioner also did not properly adjudicate the application. Therefore, the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for fresh consideration.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an application for registration under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner rejected the application after giving two opportunities for compliance, citing non-compliance and discrepancies. The assessee challenged this order before the Tribunal.

What were the issues?

Whether the rejection of the application for registration under Section 12A by the Commissioner was justified without proper adjudication, and if not, whether the matter should be remanded.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12A,Section 12AB,Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI

Before: SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY & SHRI PRABHASH SHANKAR

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra Shah, Ld. A.R
For Respondent: Shri Rakesh Ranjan, Ld. D.R
Hearing: 17.04.2025Pronounced: 25.04.2025

Per : Narender Kumar Choudhry, Judicial Member:

This appeal has been preferred by the Assessee against the order dated 07.12.2024, impugned herein, passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) (in short Ld. Commissioner) u/s 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘the Act’) for the A.Y. 2025-26.

2.

At the outset, it is observed that there is a delay of 3 days in filing the instant appeal. Considering inadvertent mistake qua delay, the same is condoned.

3.

In the instant case, the Assessee by filing an application dated 31.01.2022 in form no.10A requested for approval of registration u/s 12A of the Act, which was granted in form no.10AC on dated 08.02.2022. Thereafter, the Assessee filed an application dated 10.06.2024 in Form no.10AB for regular registration u/s 12A of the Act. The application filed by the Assessee was taken into consideration by the Ld. Commissioner, while issuing first notice dated 12.07.2024 by which the Assessee was directed to comply with the notice by 29.07.2024 and the Assessee filed some details. On verification of the same, various discrepancies were noticed by the Ld. Commissioner and therefore he again issued a notice on dated 27.11.2024, by which certain query/documents were also sought for by the Ld. Commissioner on or before 4th December 2024, however, the Assessee still made no compliance. Therefore, in the constrained circumstances, the Ld. Commissioner on 07.12.2024 passed the impugned order, rejecting the application filed by the Assessee and cancelling the registration granted vide order dated 08.02.2022 u/s 12AB r.w.s. 12A(1)(ac)(vi) of the Act.

4.

The Assessee, being aggrieved, challenged the impugned order before this Tribunal.

5.

We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. No doubt, the Ld. Commissioner, before rejecting the application filed by the Assessee, has given 02 opportunities for filing certain details/documents, however, the Assessee failed to file the same, which resulted into rejection of the application for registration u/s 12A of the Act. Admittedly, the Ld. Commissioner, in the absence of relevant reply/explanation and the documents, failed to decide the application filed by the Assessee, in its right perspective and proper manner and therefore excusing the latches of the Assessee as the Assessee admittedly in response to first notice dated 12.07.2024 had filed various documents and the second notice was issued only on finding some discrepancies in the documents filed by the Assessee and therefore in our considered view for proper and just decision of the case and substantial justice, it would be appropriate to remand the issue back to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh, however, subject to deposit of Rs.1100 in the Revenue Department under “other heads” and within 15 days from the date of receipt of this order. Thus, the case is accordingly remanded to the file of the Ld. Commissioner for decision afresh.

6.

The Assessee is also directed to comply with the notices and file the relevant documents/explanation as would be needed by the Ld. Commissioner for proper adjudication of the issue involved.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 25.04.2025.

More judgments on Section 12A

All 6,064 judgments and leading authorities on Section 12A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →