DARSHANA PIYUSH VORA,JAMNAGAR vs. PR. COMMR. OF INCOME TAX, JAMNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's prayer to withdraw the appeal as relief had been granted in their favour. Consequently, the appeal became infructuous.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax. The assessee later sought permission to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal should be withdrawn after receiving relief in their favour. The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal itself.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD & SHRI WASEEM AHMED
आदेश / O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER: The captioned appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jamnagar (Pr.CIT) dated 28/03/2016.
The assessee seeks permission vide written representation to withdraw the captioned appeal of the assessee, since relief has been granted u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act and decided in favour of the assessee, for which Ld. Departmental Representative for the Revenue has not objected. Accordingly, we are allowing the prayer for
ITA No.158/RJT/2016 Darshana Piyush Vora vs. Pr.CIT Asst.Year – 2011-12 - 2 - withdrawal of appeal by the assessee. Thus, the appeal of the assessee has become infructuous.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. This Order pronounced in Open Court on 28/02/2019
Sd/- Sd/- (WASEEM AHMED) (MAHAVIR PRASAD) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER
Ahmedabad; Dated 28/02/2019
ट�.सी.नायर, व.�न.स./T.C. NAIR, Sr. PS आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 3. संबं�धत आयकर आयु�त / Concerned CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त(अपील) / The CIT(A)/Pr.CIT-Jamnagar 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण,राजोकट/DR,ITAT, Rajkot 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy// उप/सहायक पंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, राजोकट / ITAT, Rajkot 1. Date of dictation .. 27.2.19 2. Date on which the typed draft is placed before the Dictating Member …27.2.19 3. Other Member… 4. Date on which the approved draft comes to the Sr.P.S./P.S…………….. 5. Date on which the fair order is placed before the Dictating Member for pronouncement…… 6. Date on which the fair order comes back to the Sr.P.S./P.S…….28.2.19 7. Date on which the file goes to the Bench Clerk…………………28.2.19 8. Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk…………………………………... 9. The date on which the file goes to the Assistant Registrar for signature on the order…………………….. 10. Date of Despatch of the Order………………
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026