PARTAB GULABRAI TULSIANI,DELHI vs. ACIT, INT. TAX CIRCLE 4(2)(1),, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the AO erred in reopening the assessment and making additions to the income of the assessees. The Tribunal found that the assessees were non-residents and the income in question was earned outside India.
What were the facts?
The appeals concern the reopening of assessments for AYs 2006-07 and 2007-08 for multiple assessees. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions based on foreign bank account balances, which the assessees argued were not taxable in India as they were non-residents.
What were the issues?
Whether the reopening of assessment under Section 147 was valid and whether foreign income of non-residents is taxable in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Commissioner of Income Tax v. Nova Promoters and Finlease (P) Ltd.658 citing342 ITR 169 · 2012 · HC
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI “I” BENCH : MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
| ITA No. | Α.Υ. | Appellant | Respondent | |--------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------| | 448/Mum/2025 | 2006-07| Pratab Gulabrai Tulsiani, C/o. Ashok Khandelwal Associates, Chartered Accountants, 912-B, Indraprakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 [PAN: AURPT4816C] | ACIT, Int. Tax. Circle-4(2)(1), Room No. 1708, 17th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai | | 449/Mum/2025 | 2007-08| | | 464/Mum/2025 | 2006-07| Naraindas Gulabrai Tulsiani, C/o. Ashok Khandelwal Associates, Chartered Accountants, 912-B, Indraprakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 [PAN: ANQPT0488C] | | 463/Mum/2025 | 2007-08| Sham Gulabrai Tulsyani, C/o. Ashok Khandelwal Associates, Chartered Accountants, 912-B, Indraprakash, 21, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001 [PAN: ARYPT4091R] | | 482
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026