DANGSON HOTEL & RESTAURANTS PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that notices issued under Section 143(2) prior to the filing of returns under Section 153A(1)(a) were valid. It also held that returns filed in response to Section 153A(1)(a) notices were not valid returns but merely corroborative information.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the ITAT's decision regarding the validity of notices issued under Section 143(2) prior to filing returns under Section 153A(1)(a). The appeal also questioned the validity of returns filed in response to Section 153A notices and the application of an ad-hoc rate of gross profit.
What were the issues?
The key issues are the validity of Section 143(2) notices issued before Section 153A returns and the validity of returns filed under Section 153A. The appeal also questions the justification for applying an ad-hoc rate of gross profit.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(2),Section 153A(1)(a),Section 260A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 39 . ITA 1344/2010 . . DANGSON HOTEL and RESTAURANTS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.O.S.Bajpai, Senior Advocate with Mr.V.N.Jha, Advocate . versus . CIT ..... Respondent Through: Nemo . . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . . O R D E R 06.09.2010 . . The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- ? Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that notices u/s 143(2) issued prior to the filing of returns u/s153A(1)(a) were valid and whether assessment made on the basis of such notices were not invalid in respect of assessment years 2001-02 to 2005-06? . ITA 1344/2010 Page 1 of 2 . . . Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that returns filed in response to notices u/s 153A(1)(a) were not valid returns and they were merely ?corroborative piece of information for determining the taxable income? and if so, then, whether any valid assessment or re-assessment could be made u/s 153A on the basis of such returns and whether such assessments or reassessment should not have been annulled by the Tribunal consequentially on their own reasoning as if they were based on invalid returns and whether, therefore, it makes the approach of the Tribunal self contradictory? . . . Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case in law, the Tribunal was justified in applying ad-Hon'ble Court rate of gross profit without any supporting or corroborating material?? . Issue notice. Filing of paper book stands dispensed with. . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . . MANMOHAN, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2010 Sv . . ITA 1344/2010 Page 2 of 2 . .
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026