TIN TAR RETAIL CORP,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-4(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that no addition can be made in unabated assessment years under Section 153A without incriminating material found during the search. The AO's reliance solely on ERP data without rejecting the assessee's books of account and without finding any incriminating material was incorrect.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retail garment business, had its ERP data backed up during a search. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for alleged suppressed sales by comparing ERP sales data with sales reported in the Income Tax Return (ITR), ignoring sales returns.
What were the issues?
Whether additions can be made under Section 153A in unabated assessment years without incriminating material found during search. Whether the AO correctly treated sales returns as suppressed sales without rejecting the assessee's books of account.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These four appeals filed by assessee are against the orders of Ld. CIT(A)-52, Mumbai vide order nos. i) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775469(1) ii) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775489(1) iii) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775495(1) iv) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775460(1) Tin Tar Retail Corp. AYs 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2013-14 all dated 29.11.2024, passed against the assessment orders passed by ACIT Central Circle-4(2), Mumbai, u/s.153A of the Income-tax Act
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026