TIN TAR RETAIL CORP,MUMBAI vs. ACIT, CC-4(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the books of accounts maintained in the ERP system, without rejection, do not constitute incriminating material for additions under Section 153A in unabated years. The assessee's explanations and documentary evidence adequately addressed the AO's concerns regarding sales returns.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a retail garment trader, had its ERP server data backed up during a search action. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for alleged suppressed sales by comparing ERP data with sales returns, ignoring the assessee's reconciliation efforts.
What were the issues?
Whether additions can be made under Section 153A in unabated assessment years without incriminating material found during search, and whether the AO correctly treated sales returns as suppressed sales.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “E” BENCH MUMBAI
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
These four appeals filed by assessee are against the orders of Ld. CIT(A)-52, Mumbai vide order nos.
i) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775469(1) ii) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775489(1) iii) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775495(1) iv) ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1070775460(1) Tin Tar Retail Corp. AYs 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2013-14 all dated 29.11.2024, passed against the assessment orders passed by ACIT Central Circle-4(2), Mumbai, u/s. 153A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Kalinga Paper Mart, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Kabita Nayak vs. Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, KhurdaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Swastika Ingot PVT.LTD, Sundargarh vs. The Addl Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Basudev Logistics, Jagatsinghpur vs. Principal Commissioner, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026