DANGSON HOTEL & RESTAURANTS PVT LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that notices issued under Section 143(2) prior to the filing of returns under Section 153A(1)(a) were valid. It also held that returns filed in response to Section 153A(1)(a) notices were not valid returns but merely corroborative information, and that an ad-hoc rate of gross profit was applied without supporting material.
What were the facts?
The appellant is challenging the ITAT's decision regarding the validity of notices issued under Section 143(2) prior to the filing of returns under Section 153A(1)(a). The ITAT also ruled on the validity of returns filed in response to Section 153A notices and the application of an ad-hoc rate of gross profit.
What were the issues?
The key issues concern the validity of notices issued under Section 143(2) before Section 153A returns and the legal standing of returns filed under Section 153A. The application of an ad-hoc gross profit rate without evidence is also a significant issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(2),Section 153A(1)(a),Section 260A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 41 . ITA 1346/2010 . DANGSON HOTEL and RESTAURANTS PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.O.S.Bajpai, Senior Advocate with Mr.V.N.Jha, Advocate . versus . CIT ..... Respondent Through: Nemo . . CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN . . . . O R D E R 06.09.2010 . . The present appeal preferred under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is admitted on the following substantial questions of law:- ? Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that notices u/s 143(2) issued prior to the filing of returns u/s153A(1)(a) were valid and whether assessment made on the basis of such notices were not invalid in respect of assessment years 2001-02 to 2005-06? . . ITA 1346/2010 Page 1 of 2 . . Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in holding that returns filed in response to notices u/s 153A(1)(a) were not valid returns and they were merely ?corroborative piece of information for determining the taxable income? and if so, then, whether any valid assessment or re-assessment could be made u/s 153A on the basis of such returns and whether such assessments or reassessment should not have been annulled by the Tribunal consequentially on their own reasoning as if they were based on invalid returns and whether, therefore, it makes the approach of the Tribunal self contradictory? . Whether on the facts and the circumstances of the case in law, the Tribunal was justified in applying ad-Hon'ble Court rate of gross profit without any supporting or corroborating material?? . Issue notice. Filing of paper book stands dispensed with. . . CHIEF JUSTICE . . . MANMOHAN, J SEPTEMBER 06, 2010 sv . . ITA 1346/2010 Page 2 of 2 . . .
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026