DAE(SY22) LEASING (IRELAND)41, DESIGNATED ACTIVITY COMPANY ,MUMBAI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE 2(1)(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the leased aircraft were operated in international traffic, thus falling under Article 8 of the India-Ireland DTAA, which grants exclusive taxation rights to the country of residence. Consequently, no Permanent Establishment (PE) existed in India, and the lease rentals were not taxable in India.
What were the facts?
The appeals involved Irish aircraft leasing companies challenging assessment orders for AY 2022-23. The core issue was the taxability of lease rentals in India, with the assessees claiming benefits under the India-Ireland Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).
What were the issues?
The key issues were the existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India, the applicability of Article 8 of the India-Ireland DTAA for aircraft leasing income, and whether lease rentals constituted royalty or business income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 143(3),Section 144C,Section 153,Section 234A,Section 234B,Section 270A,Section 274,Section 9(1)(vi)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- KOTAK MAHINDRA CO. LTD. AND ANOTHER. 367 50.(1987) 3 SCC 544: MADHAV AYAWADANRAO HOSKOT v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. 51250 citing10 SCC 1 · 2014 · SC
- Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India216 citing6 SCC 613 · 2012 · SC
- (i) Formula One World Championship Ltd. v. CIT200 citing13 SCC 294 · 2017 · SC
- Asea Brown Boveri Limited v. Industrial Finance Corporation of India Ltd.157 citing154 Taxmann 512 · 2006 · SC
- Assessing Officer (International Taxation) v. Nestle SA122 citing458 ITR 756 · 2023 · SC · Read judgment
- 154 Taxman 512 (SC) and Association of Leasing & Financial Services v. Union of India113 citing2 SCC 362 · 2011
- CIT v. Shree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd.55 citing313 ITR 231 · 2009 · HC · Read judgment
- Oberoi Hotel Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax42 citing236 ITR 903 · 1999 · SC · Read judgment
- Tekniskil (Sendirian) Berhard v. CIT25 citing222 ITR 551 · 1996
- CIT v. Subsea Offshore Ltd.12 citing66 ITD 296 · 1998 · ITAT
- (Sendirian) Berhard v. CIT7 citing1996 SCC OnLine AAR 12 · 1996
- Bid Services Division (Mauritius) Ltd. v. Authority of Advance Ruling (Income-tax)6 citing453 ITR 461 · 2023 · HC
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, „I‟ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & MS PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. AY Assessee/ Respondent Appellant ITA No. 2022-23 Sky High Appeal XLIII The Assistant 1122/Mum/2025 Leasing Company Commissioner Limited of Income Tax 2, Grand Canal Square (International Grand Canal Harbour Tax) Circle Dublin, D02 A342 4(2)(1), Ireland Mumbai C/o. DMD Advocates 30, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi-110 013 PAN: ABFCS0569K SA 2022-23 Sky High Appeal XLIII The Assistant No.38/Mum/2025 Leasing Company Commissioner (Arising out of Limited of Income Tax ITA No. 2, Grand Canal Square (International 1122/Mum/2025 Grand Canal Harbour Tax) Circle Dublin, D02 A342 4(2)(1), Ireland Mumbai C/o. DMD Advocates 30, Nizamuddin East, New Delhi-110 013 PAN: ABFCS0569K ITA No. 2022-23 Ortus Aircraft Lease Deputy 1106/Mum/2025 6 (Doublin) Limited Commissioner 32, Molesworth of Income Street, Dublin 2, Tax, Ireland.
International C/o. DMD Advocates Tax, Circle 30, Nizamuddin East, 3(2)(2), New Delhi-110 013 Mumbai PAN: AADCO1624J SA 2022-23 Ortus Aircraft Lease Deputy No.37/Mum/2025 6 (Doublin) Limited Commissioner ITA 32, Molesworth of Income No.11
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144C
- Mishoo Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 19/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 18/KOL/2026[2016-2017]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2016-2017
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 17/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 16/KOL/2026[2014-2015]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2014-2015
- Anshu Sahay, Bangalore vs ACIT, Circle 2(1), It, KolkataITTPA 15/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026