TATA DIGITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. DCIT 1(3)(1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee is undisputedly entitled to the credit of TDS of Rs.27,88,922/- deducted by M/s. AIX Connect Pvt Ltd. The Tribunal noted that it is the assessee's case that the corresponding income has already been offered for tax during the year under consideration, and the TDS was deposited by the deductor in a subsequent year, which falls within AY 2024-25. Therefore, the credit of TDS should be allowed in the year under consideration. The Tribunal deemed it appropriate to restore the matter to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) for verification of the assessee's claim and to allow credit for the impugned TDS in the relevant year in which the income has been brought to tax. The Tribunal also emphasized that the assessee should be given an adequate opportunity to submit requisite details and evidences. The issue of violation of principles of natural justice and notification no. 01/2021 was implicitly addressed by remanding the matter for proper verification and opportunity.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Tata Digital Private Limited, filed its return for Assessment Year 2024-25 declaring a total loss and claiming a refund. The return was processed under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Central Processing Centre (CPC) issued an intimation, accepting the returned loss but allowing a refund of Rs.10,94,04,264/-, by granting short TDS credit of Rs.30,96,966/-. This disallowance pertained to TDS of Rs.27,88,922/- from M/s. AIX Connect Private Limited and Rs.3,07,976/- from M/s. MO Engage India Pvt Ltd. The assessee appealed to the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [Id. CIT(A)]. The assessee withdrew the ground related to M/s. MO Engage India Pvt Ltd. as the deductor revised its TDS return. The Id. CIT(A) upheld the CPC's action regarding M/s. AIX Connect Private Limited, citing non-satisfaction of conditions under Rule 37BA. The assessee's appeal against this order is now before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT).
What were the issues?
1. Whether the Ld. CIT(A) erred in denying the TDS credit of Rs.27,88,922/- pertaining to M/s. AIX Connect Private Limited for Assessment Year 2024-25, thereby violating principles of natural justice and notification no. 01/2021 by not providing a virtual hearing opportunity, and in law, failing to appreciate that the assessee offered corresponding income, the TDS was deposited in a subsequent year, and credit was claimed in the relevant year as per Section 199 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 read with Rule 37BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the denial of TDS credit was bad in law and invalid. They contended that they had offered the corresponding income to tax, the TDS was deposited by the deductor in a subsequent year (which fell within AY 2024-25), and they claimed the TDS credit in the correct assessment year as per Section 199 and Rule 37BA. They also argued that the denial violated principles of natural justice due to the lack of a virtual hearing opportunity as per notification no. 01/2021. Revenue's Contention: The judgment records no specific arguments made by the revenue before the ITAT.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 199,Section 143(1),Section 250,Section 244A,Section 155(20)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE & SMT. RENU JAUHRI
आदेश / O R D E R PER RENU JAUHRI [A.M.] :- This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the ADDL/JCIT (A)-2 Chennai [Ld. CIT(A)], dated 05.03.2025 passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as “Act”] for Assessment Year 2024-25.
The assessee has raised the following grounds in this appeal. “General Ground:
1. On the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, the order passed by the Hon’ble Learned Addl / JCIT (A)-2 (hereinafter referred as “Ld CIT(A)”) is bad in law and invalid.
AY 20224-25 Tata Digital Private Limited 2. Ground 2 – Denial of Tax Deducted at Source (‘TDS’) credit of Rs. 27,88,922/- 2.1 The Ld CIT(A) erred in denying the TDS credit of aforementioned amount without providing reasonable opportunity of being heard through virtual hearing to the Appellant, thereby violating the principles of natural justice and additionally not following the point 12(3) of the Notification no. 139 of 2021 dated 28 December,2021 laying down the requirement to provide an opportunity to the Appellant for virtual hearing. 2.2 On the facts and the circumstances of the case and in law, Ld CIT(A) grossly erred in denying the TDS credit of Rs. 27,88,922/- pertaining to M/s. AIX Connect Private Limited [Formerly known as M/s. AirAsia (India) Limited]. 2.3 In doing so, he failed to appreciate that: - Appellant has claimed TDS credit as per the provision of section 199 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred as “the Act”) read with Rule 37BA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Appellant has already offered to tax the corresponding income pertaining to M/s. AIX Connect Private Limited in its return of income for the year under consideration. - The said TDS of Rs. 27,88,922/- deducted by M/s. AIX Connect Private Limited has been deposited by them in the subsequent year and the same is reflected in Form 26AS for the said year. - Appellant has Claimed the TDS of Rs. 27,88,922/- in its return of income for the Assessment year 2024-25 and accordingly, credit of TDS on the said income needs to be given Assessment Year 2024-25 only i.e. year under consideration.
Ground 3- Interest u/s 244A of the Act Suitable direction may be given to AO to calculate interest u/s. 244A of the Act on TDS credit of Rs. 27,88,922/- (which was denied while processing the return u/s. 143(1) of the Act) from April 2024 to actual date of refund. The above grounds are without prejudice to each other. The Appellant craves leave to add and/or to alter, amend, rescind or modify the grounds of appeal
or produce further documents, facts and evidence before or at the time of hearing with your honours.”
3. Although assessee has taken 5 grounds of appeal but sole substantive issue relates to denial of credit of TDS Rs. 27,88,922/- for AY 2024-25.
Brief facts of the case are that assessee filed its return declaring total loss of Rs. 11,48,78,53,452/- and claimed refund of Rs. 11,25,01,230/-. The return was processed u/s. 143(1) and the CPC issued an intimation dated 24.12.2024, AY 20224-25 Tata Digital Private Limited accepting the returned loss, but allowing refund of only Rs. 10,94,04,264/- by granting short TDS credit of Rs. 30,96,966/-. TDS claim disallowed pertains to M/s. AIX Connect Pvt Ltd. (Rs. 27,88,922/-) and M/s. MO Engage India Pvt Ltd. (Rs. 3,07,976/-). Aggrieved with the action of the CPC, the assessee preferred an appeal before Ld. CIT(A). It was contended by the assessee that it had already offered the corresponding income pertaining to M/s. AIX Connect Pvt Ltd in its return of income for AY 2024-25. The corresponding TDS of Rs. 27,88,922/- deducted by M/s. AIX Connect Pvt Ltd. has also been deposited by them in the subsequent year. With regard to the short credit of TDS of Rs. 3,07,976/- the assessee withdrew the ground of appeal as the said deductor had revised its TDS return against the credit note issued in the subsequent year. Ld. CIT(A) after referring to Rule 37BA held that the conditions prescribed therein for claiming TDS credit are not satisfied and hence, upheld the action of the CPC in denying the TDS credit. However, Ld. CIT(A) observed that w.e.f. 01.10.2023 in view of the provisions of Section 155(20) of the Act, the Assessee may consider filing of application for relief. Against the dismissal of the appeal the assessee has filed present appeal by the Ld. CIT(A) before the Tribunal.
We have heard the rival submissions and perused the applicable provisions. Undisputedly, the assessee is entitled to the credit of TDS of Rs. 27,88,922/- deducted by M/s. AIX Connect Pvt ltd. It is the assessee’s case that the corresponding income has already been offered for tax during the year under consideration and therefore, the said TDS deducted by M/s. AIX Connect AY 20224-25 Tata Digital Private Limited Pvt Ltd and deposited by them in the subsequent year should be considered in AY 2024-25 and accordingly, credit of TDS should be allowed in the year under consideration under these circumstances, we deem it appropriate to restore the matter to the Ld. jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) for verification of assessee’s claim and allow credit for the impugned TDS in the relevant year in which income has been brought to tax. Needless to add the assessees should be given adequate opportunity to submit requisite details and evidences in support of its claim.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 14.08.2025.
More judgments on Section 199
- M/S. Harsha Engineers International Ltd… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1357/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Harsha Engineers International Ltd… vs The Dy.CIT, Circle-2(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 1357/AHD/2024[2018-19]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Highrise Slipform Infra Private Limited… vs Additional/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1267/PUN/2026[AY 2024-25]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Hiteshkumar Mohanlal Desai, Daman vs The Assessment Unit, ITO, Daman Ward, DamanITA 962/SRT/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Bamaniya vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Secretary Ministry Of Home AffairsMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Patidar vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Lokesh vs. Bank Of Maharashtra Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Arvind Lunawat vs. Axis Bank LimitedMadhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026