DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), HYDERABAD vs. REDPINE SIGNALS INC, HYDERABAD
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to low tax effect, as it was below the threshold limit specified by CBDT circulars. The appeal was dismissed on this ground.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was against an order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable before the Tribunal given the tax effect and the prevailing CBDT circulars regarding monetary limits for filing appeals.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, HYDERABAD BENCHES “B”, HYDERABAD
Before: SHRI D.KARUNAKARA RAO & SHRI V.DURGA RAO
PER D.KARUNAKARA RAO, A.M. :
This appeal of Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Hyderabad, dated 22-01-2018.
At the time of hearing, it has been brought to our notice that as per the CBDT Circular No.03/2018 dated 11-07-2018 and Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8th August, 2019, the tax limit for filing of appeal by the Revenue before the Tribunal has been fixed at Rs.50 Lakhs.
:- 2 -: ITA No. 614/Hyd/2018
After hearing Ld.DR and perusing the records as placed before us, we find that this appeal is covered by the aforesaid circulars and therefore, not maintainable, since the tax effect in this appeal is less than Rs.50 Lakhs and apparently the case is not covered by any of the exceptions in the circulars. We therefore dismiss this appeal on account of low tax effect. However, the Revenue is at liberty to seek recall of the order, if the case is found to be falling within the exceptions mentioned in the circulars cited above.
In the result, the appeal filed by Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 4th December, 2019
Sd/- Sd/- (V. DURGA RAO) (D. KARUNAKARA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Hyderabad, Dated 4th December, 2019 TNMM
:- 3 -: ITA No. 614/Hyd/2018
Copy to :
The Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-3(1), Hyderabad.
Redpine Signals Inc., 9th Floor, Maximus Towers, 2B, Raheja Mind Space IT Park, Hitech City, Madhapur, Hyderabad.
CIT(Appeals)-3, Hyderabad.
Pr.CIT-3, Hyderabad. 5. D.R. ITAT, Hyderabad.
Guard File.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026