PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - 02 vs. M/S B.L. KASHYAP AND SONS LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA - 455 / 2022HC Delhi16 November 20222 pages
For Petitioner: ZOHEB HOSSAIN
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court admitted the appeal and framed substantial questions of law regarding the extension of time under Section 142(2C) and the validity of the Assessing Officer's actions under Section 292B.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed a High Court order concerning the extension of time under Section 142(2C) of the Income Tax Act. The appeal raises questions about whether the Assessing Officer granted an extension and if such power can be exercised by a superior authority.

What were the issues?

The key issues are whether the Assessing Officer validly extended time under Section 142(2C) and if the actions were in conformity with the Act's intent, considering Section 292B.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 142(2C),Section 292B

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 455/2022 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL - 02 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing Counsel for the Revenue with Mr.Vipul Agrawal and Mr.Parth Semwal, Advocates. versus M/S B.L. KASHYAP AND SONS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Rohit Jain with Mr.Aniket D.Agrawal, Mr.Abhisek Singhvi and Mr.Deepesh Jain, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 16.11.2022 Admit. The following substantial questions of law arise for consideration in the present appeal:- (A) Whether in the present case, the Assessing Officer has granted extension of time under the proviso to Section 142(2C) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’)? (B) Whether the power of extension of time under the proviso to Section 142(2C) of Act is procedural/administrative in nature and can be exercised by an authority superior to the Assessing Officer? This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:31:06

(C) Whether without prejudice to the above, in light of provision of Section 292B of the Act, can the act of the Assessing Officer not be said to be in substance and effect in conformity with or according to the intent and purpose of the Act, and hence valid and sustainable in law? Issue notice. Mr.Rohit Jain, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. List the matter on 28th February, 2023 for hearing and disposal. Both the parties are directed to file their short written submissions not exceeding three pages each along with the judgments and documents that they wish to rely upon, at least a week prior to the next date of hearing. MANMOHAN, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J NOVEMBER 16, 2022 KA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/03/2026 at 14:31:06

More judgments on Section 142(2C)

All 83 judgments and leading authorities on Section 142(2C) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →