M/S. KANNUR RANGE KALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The provided text is an excerpt from the cause list of a writ petition and does not contain the judgment of the High Court. Therefore, it is not possible to ascertain what the High Court decided, the reasoning behind its decision, the ratio decidendi, or any operative directions. No issue was expressly left undecided as the judgment itself is not present.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, M/s. Kannur Range Kallu Chethu Vyavasaya Thozhilali Sahakarana Sangham, presently known as Kannur Range Agricultural Products Toddy Tappers Co-operative Society Ltd., filed a writ petition before the High Court of Kerala. The petitioner is challenging an order or action by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Kannur, and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Kannur Range, is also a respondent. The specific assessment year(s) and the amount in dispute are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The procedural history leading to this writ petition is not detailed.
What were the issues?
The provided text does not contain the specific issues that the High Court had to decide, nor does it record the arguments presented by the petitioner or the revenue. Therefore, the questions of law or mixed law and fact, the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, and the contentions of each side, including any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon, are not available for analysis.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2013/25TH ASWINA, 1935 WP(C).No. 25050 of 2013 (E) PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- M/S. KANNUR RANGE KALLU CHETHU VYAVASAYA THOZHILALI SAHAKARANA SANGHAM (PRESENTLY KNOWN AS KANNUR RANGE AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS TODDY TAPPERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.)NO.C.1542 SOUTH BAZAAR, KANNUR 670 002 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SRI A.M.RAJESH BY ADVS.SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN (SR.) SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN RESPONDENT(S): 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -1, KANNUR 670 001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), 4TH FLOOR, NORTH BKLOCK, AYYAKKAR BHAVAN MANNANCHIRA, KOZHIKODE 673 001. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX KANNUR RANGE, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KUANNOTHUMCHAL KANNUR 670 006. R BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-10- 2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 25050 of 2013 (E) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25/3/2013 FOR 2008-09 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 25/3/2013 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT FOR 2009-10 EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 23/4/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR 2008-09 EXHIBIT P3(A) COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 20/7/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR 2008-09 EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL DATED 23/4/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR 2009-10 EXHIBIT P4(A) COPY OF STAY PETITION DATED 20/7/2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT FOR 2009-10 EXHIBIT P5 COPY OF THE NOTICE AAAAK 5179P DATED 25/7/2013 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P6 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4/10/2013 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT FOR 2008-09 & 2009-10 EXHIBIT P7 COPY OF THE STAY PETITION DATED 20-7-2013 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL TRUE COPY P.A TO JUDGE SMM
V.CHITAMBARESH,J. = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.25050 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 17th day of October, 2013
J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Exts.P3 and P4 appeal against Exts.P1 and P2 orders of assessment under the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appeals are accompanied by Exts.P3(a) and Ext.P7 petitions for stay of recovery of the disputed tax. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P5 notice served on it during the pendency of the appeals and the petitions for stay. 2. I direct the second respondent to consider Exts.P3(a) and P7 petitions with notice to the petitioner within a period of two months. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P5 notice shall be put on hold till orders are passed on Exts.P3(a) and P7 petitions as directed above. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition with the judgment before the second respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE smm
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Jaleswar Packaging, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 11 Nov 2026
- Talasethi Sanmukharao vs. Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 11 Nov 2026
- M/S Ramamani Behera (Trade Name S.V.Enterprises) Bhubaneswar vs. Addl Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 11 Nov 2026
- Prasanta Kumar Biswal vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 11 Nov 2026
- M/S.Dibyanee Agency., Keonjhar. vs. Chief Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 11 Nov 2026