J D A vs. COMMI OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the show cause notices under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, cannot be given effect to at this stage, as the Appellate Tribunal had ordered the issuance of a Section 12AA certificate in favour of the petitioner Authority. Similarly, the demand notice for assessment year 2012-13 would not be given effect to. The Court clarified that if the order of the Appellate Tribunal directing the issuance of the Section 12AA certificate is reversed or stayed, the Income Tax Department would be at liberty to take appropriate proceedings in pursuance to the show cause notice and demand notice. Until then, the Department was directed not to press the impugned show cause notice and demand notice. The writ petitions were disposed of with these clarifications.
What were the facts?
The Jaipur Development Authority (JDA) filed writ petitions challenging show cause notices issued under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for two assessment years. The JDA's certificate under Section 12AA of the Act had been withdrawn by the Department. However, the JDA successfully appealed this withdrawal before the Appellate Tribunal, which ordered the issuance of the Section 12AA certificate. In a separate writ petition, the JDA challenged an order rejecting its stay application and directing the deposit of outstanding amounts for assessment year 2012-13, which was also based on the withdrawal of its Section 12AA certificate.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the show cause notices issued under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, are liable to be set aside in light of the Appellate Tribunal's order directing the issuance of a Section 12AA certificate in favour of the petitioner Authority. (Question of law and fact) 2. Whether the demand notice for assessment year 2012-13 should be given effect to, considering the Appellate Tribunal's order for issuance of a Section 12AA certificate. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner Authority argued that since the Appellate Tribunal had ruled in its favour regarding the withdrawal of its Section 12AA certificate, the show cause notices under Section 263 and the demand notice should be set aside as the Authority is now exempted from the Act. Revenue's Contention: The respondent Department stated that they would not press the impugned show cause notice under Section 263 at present, given the Tribunal's order. However, they reserved the right to challenge the Tribunal's order and, in case of an interim order or reversal, to pursue the show cause notice. They sought clarification on their rights.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur along with others 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur AND S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3977/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur AND S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.3340/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur Date of Order : 27th October, 2014 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.BHANDARI
Mr.Sanjay Jhanwar, for the petitioner/s. Mr.Sameer Jain, for the respondent/s. By the Court: With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these writ petitions are heard finally.
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur along with others 2 The writ petition Nos.4075/2014 & 3977/2014 have been filed to challenge the Show Cause Notice under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “Act of 1961”) for two assessment years. Learned counsel for the petitioner Authority submits that during pendency of the writ petitions, an appeal against withdrawal of certificate under Section 12 AA of the Act of 1961 has been decided favourable to the petitioner Authority, thus the Show Cause Notice deserves to be set aside as the petitioner Authority is now exempted from the Act of 1961. Learned counsel for the respondent/s submits that in view of the order passed by the Tribunal to issue certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961, they would not press the impugned Show Cause Notice under Section 263 of the Act of 1961 at present but the Department is free to take decision to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal. In case of interim order or reversal of the order, they would be having authority to pursue the Show Cause Notice under Section 263 of the Act of 1961. In view of the aforesaid, while disposing of these writ petitions, necessary clarification may be made in regard to the
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur along with others 3 rights of the Income Tax Department. I have considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The JDA was having certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961. The aforesaid certificate was withdrawn by the Department. A challenge to the withdrawal was made by the JDA before the Appellate Tribunal and remained successful. The certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961 is ordered to be issued in favour of the petitioner Authority. In the background aforesaid, Show Cause Notice under Section 263 of the Act of 1961 cannot be given effect at this stage. It is, however, clarified that if the order passed by the Appellate Tribunal with the direction to issue certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961 is reversed or stayed, the respondent/s would be at liberty to take appropriate proceedings in pursuance to the Show Cause Notice but till then, they will not press the impugned Show Cause Notice. The writ petition bearing Nos.4075/2014 & 3977/2014 are stands disposed of with the aforesaid. This disposes of the stay applications as well.
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur along with others 4 The writ petition bearing SB Civil Writ Petition No.3340/2014 makes a challenge to the order dated 14 th March, 2014 whereby the stay prayed by the petitioner Authority was rejected with the direction to deposit the outstanding amount. It was on withdrawal of certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961, however, the Appellate Tribunal has allowed the appeal preferred by the petitioner Authority with the direction for issuance of certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961. In view of the above, the Demand Notice for the assessment year 2012-13 would not be given effect till the order of the Appellate Tribunal is reversed or stayed. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with the clarification that the respondent/s would not press the Demand Notice for the assessment year 2012-13 till the order of Appellate Tribunal against withdrawal of the certificate under Section 12AA of the Act of 1961 is stayed or decided favourable to the Income Tax Department. The stay application is also disposed of accordingly. (M.N. BHANDARI), J. S/No.35 to 37 Preeti, P.A. All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.4075/2014 Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jaipur along with others 5 judgment/order being emailed. Preeti Asopa P.A.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Pawan Kumar Rajgaria vs. State Of West BengalCalcutta · 4 Nov 2026
- Mohammed Fazil vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 4 Nov 2026
- Tvl. Devaerakkam Mercy Mary vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 4 Nov 2026
- Procter And Gamble Health LTD vs. Union Of INDIATelangana · 4 Nov 2026
- M/S Ritika Ispat PVT. Limited, Balanda, Sundargarh vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 4 Nov 2026