M/S.HOLY FAITH BUILDERS vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)
What did the High Court hold?
The provided text is an excerpt from a High Court writ petition and does not contain any findings or decisions made by the Tribunal. Therefore, the holding on any issue, the reasoning, the ratio decidendi, and any operative directions are not available in this excerpt. The judgment does not record any specific relief granted or any issue left undecided.
What were the facts?
The petitioner, M/s. Holy Faith Builders & Developers Pvt Ltd, is challenging an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)). The assessment years are not explicitly stated in the provided text. The petitioner is represented by its Managing Director. The respondents include the CIT(A), the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT), and three banks: HDFC Bank Ltd, Federal Bank Ltd, and State Bank of India. The writ petition was filed before the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam.
What were the issues?
The provided text is an excerpt from a High Court writ petition and does not contain the specific issues that the Tribunal had to decide, nor the arguments presented by the assessee or the revenue. Therefore, the questions of law or mixed law and fact, the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act, and the contentions of each side, including any authorities, circulars, or precedents relied upon, are not recorded in this excerpt.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/16TH KARTHIKA, 1935 WP(C).No. 27338 of 2013 (N) ---------------------------- PETITIONER : -------------------------- M/S. HOLY FAITH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT LTD, 34/2353, MAMANGALAM, PALARIVATTAM P.O., ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 025, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, SANY FRANCIS, AGED 47 YEARS, S/O.LATE K.C.FRANCIS.
BY ADV. SRI.PEEYUS A.KOTTAM RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 018 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1 (2), COCHIN, PIN-682 018 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK LTD, M.G.ROAD, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 016 4. THE BRANCH MANAGER, FEDERAL BANK LTD, PACHALAM, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 012 5. THE BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, PALARIVATTAM BRANCH, ERNAKULAM, COCHIN-682 025.
R1 & R2 BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, INCOME TAX R3 BY SRI.T.RAJESH,SC, HDFC BANK R5 BY SRI.THOMAS JAMES MUNDACKAL,SC, SBI THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-11-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: sts
WP(C)NO.27338/2013 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 01/12/2011 FOR THE YEAR 2009-10 P2 COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 11/01/2012 FILED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P3 COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 11/01/2012 FOR RS.2,000/- OF STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE PAID BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR PREFERRING APPEAL P4 COPY OF THE STAY APPLICATION DATED 17/10/2013 SUBMITTED BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT ALONG WITH EXT.P2 APPEAL P5 COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 19/03/2013 FOR RS.25,00,000/- OF STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE PAID BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P5(A) COPY OF THE CHALLAN DATED 19/03/2013 FOR RS.12,50,000/- OF STATE BANK OF TRAVANCORE PAID BY PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P6 COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.AC.CIR.1(2)/AABCH6383D/226(3)/2013-14 DATED 11/10/2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT P6(A) COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.AC.CIR.1(2)/AABCH6383D/226(3)/2013-14 DATED 11/10/2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 4TH RESPONDENT P6(B) COPY OF THE NOTICE NO.AC.CIR.1(2)/AABCH6383D/226(3)/2013-14 DATED 11/10/2013 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 5TH RESPONDENT RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO.JUDGE sts
V.CHITAMBARESH,J. = = = = = = = = = = = W.P.(C) No.27338 of 2013 = = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 7th day of November, 2013
J U D G M E N T The petitioner has filed Ext.P2 appeal against Ext.P1 order of assessment under the Income Tax Act. The appeal is accompanied by Ext.P4 petition for stay of recovery of the disputed tax. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P6 series demand notices served on the bank wherein the accounts are maintained. 2. I direct the first respondent to consider Ext.P4 petition with notice to the petitioner within a period of two months. The coercive steps pursuant to Ext.P6 series notices shall be put on hold in the meanwhile. Needless to say that the petitioner can be permitted to operate the accounts in the bank pending final orders on Ext.P4 petition for stay. 3. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition with the judgment before the first respondent for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of. V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE smm
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Ishwar Chandra Barik, Keonjhar vs. Commissioner(Appeal), GST, Central Excise And Customs, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Surveillance System, Sambalpur vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST Odisha , CT And GST Commissionerate , Cuttack OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026