ACI WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition by issuing directions to the respondents to consider the petitioner's refund claims for assessment years 2008-2009, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2017-2018, and 2021-2022. These directions were to be complied with within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order. Regarding the claim for interest on refunds, the court accepted the submission of the revenue and left the question of interest open to be considered by the respondents, subject to the circumstances of the case. No specific finding was recorded on the entitlement to interest, but the general direction for considering refunds was granted.
What were the facts?
ACI Worldwide Solutions Private Limited (the petitioner) filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka seeking directions against the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and other revenue authorities. The petition concerns multiple assessment years: 2008-09, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2017-18, and 2021-22. The petitioner sought directions to grant refunds determined by various orders, including a rectified Order-Giving-Effect (OGE) dated 16.11.2022 for AY 2008-09, an OGE to ITAT order dated 10.01.2023 for AY 2011-12, and an OGE to ITAT order dated 03.02.2022 for AY 2012-13. Additionally, the petitioner requested consideration of a rectification application dated 04.02.2022 for AY 2017-18, processing of a refund held on hold for AY 2021-22, and grant of interest on refunds under Section 244A for all mentioned assessment years.
What were the issues?
The primary issue before the High Court was whether to issue a writ of mandamus directing the revenue authorities to grant refunds and interest on refunds as claimed by the petitioner for various assessment years. The petitioner argued that refunds were determined by specific orders and rectification applications, and that interest was due under Section 244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The revenue, represented by the learned Senior Standing counsel, did not dispute the petitioner's claim for refunds but submitted that the question of interest should be left open for the respondents to consider based on the circumstances. The court had to decide on the extent of directions to be issued regarding the grant of refunds and the claim for interest.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 244A(1),Section 244A(1A)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
- 1 -
WP No. 5313 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 5313 OF 2023 (T-IT) BETWEEN: ACI WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED, NO.9, SALARPURIA CAMBRIDGE MALL, CAMBRIDGE ROAD, ULSOOR, BANGALORE - 560 008 (REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MRS. JYOTHSNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, D/O MR. BOLA MANOHAR SHETTY) COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER COMAPANIES ACT 1956.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARENDRA KUMAR J. JAIN, ADVOCATE) AND:
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 1(1) (1), 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TP CIRCLE 1 (1) (1) 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE - 560 095.
Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
WP No. 5313 of 2023
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT, (CPC) INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT BENGALURU - 560 500.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.V.ARAVIND A/W SRI. M.DILIP, ADVOCATES)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE AS FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE, TO THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT TO GRANT REFUND OF SUM DETERMINED AS PER RECTIFIED OGE DATED 16.11.2022 FOR AY 2008-09. THE RECTIFIED ORDER IS ENCLOSED AS ANNXURE-A1 FOR AY 2008-09; TO ISSUE AS FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY THE APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE, TO THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT TO GRANT REFUND OF
SUM DETERMINED AS PER OGE TO ITAT ORDER DATED 10.01.2023 FOR AY 2011-2012. A COPY OF OGE TO ITAT ORDER FOR AY 2011-12 IS ENCLOSED AS ANNXURE- B1; ISSUE AS FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE, TO THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT TO GRANT REFUND OF SUM DETERMINED AS PER OGE TO ITAT ORDER DATED 03.02.2022 FOR AY 2012-2013. A COPY OF OGE TO ITAT ORDER FOR AY 2011-12 IS ENCLOSED AS ANNXURE- C1; TO ISSUE AS FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE TO THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE RECTIFICATION APPLICATION DATED 04.02.2022 FOR AY 2017-2018 ENCLOSED IN ANNXURE-D2 AND PASS OGE TO ITAT ORDER DATED 13.05.2022, ENCLOSED AS ANNXURE-D4; TO ISSUE AS FOR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE, TO THE
- 3 -
WP No. 5313 of 2023
LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT TO ISSUE INTIMATION AND PROCESS REFUND, WHICH REFUND IS KEPT ON HOLD FOR AY 2021-22; TO ISSUE AS FAR AS PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS OR OTHERWISE, DIRECTING THE LEARNED RESPONDENT TO GRANT INTEREST ON REFUND AS STIPULATED UNDER SECTION 244A(1) AND 244(1A) FOR AY 2008- 2009, AY 2011-12 , AY 2012-2013, AY 2017-18 AND AY 2021-22.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
i. for directions to the first respondent to grant refund of sum determined as per rectified OGE dated 16.11.2022 for AY 2008-09. The rectified Order is enclosed as Annexure A1 for AY 2008-09.
ii. for directions to the first respondent to grant refund of sum determined as per OGE to ITAT order dated 10.01.2023 for AY 2011-12. A copy of OGE to ITAT Order for AY 2011-12 is enclosed as Annexure B1.
- 4 -
WP No. 5313 of 2023
iii. for directions to the first respondent to grant refund of sum determined as per OGE to ITAT order dated 03.02.2022 for AY 2012-13. A copy of OGE to ITAT order for AY 2011-12 is enclosed as Annexure C1.
iv. for directions to the first respondent to consider rectification application dated 04.02.2022 for AY 2017-2018 enclosed in Annexure D2 and pass OGE to ITAT order dated 13.05.2022, enclosed as Annexure D4.
v. for directions to the first respondent to issue intimation, and process refund, which refund is kept on hold for AY 2021-22.
vi. for directions to the respondent to grant interest on refund as stipulated under section 244A(1) and 244A(1A) for AY 2008-09, AY 2011-12, AY 2012-13, AY 2017-18 and AY 2021-22"
The petitioner in addition to the afore, has also sought for directions to the respondents to grant
- 5 -
WP No. 5313 of 2023
interest on the amount claimed as refunds in terms of the aforesaid prayer.
Sri. Narendra Kumar J. Jain, the learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri. K.V.Aravind, the learned Senior Standing counsel for the respondents, are heard. There is no dispute that the petitioner's claim for refund consequent to the Order-Giving- Effect which is dated 16.11.2022 for the assessment year 2008-2009, and the rectification application for the assessment years 2017-2018 is pending consideration, there could be directions.
Sri. K.V.Aravind submits that the petition could be disposed of with necessary directions but the question of interest must be left open to be considered by the respondents subject to the circumstances of the case. Indeed, that must be so and as such, the petition stands disposed of directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's refund
- 6 -
WP No. 5313 of 2023
for the assessment years 2008-2009, 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2017-2018 and 2021-2022 within a period of three [3] months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
Sd/- JUDGE
More judgments on Section 244A(1A)
- Itc Infotech India Limited, Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 2941/KOL/2025[2014-2015]Status: Disposed20 May 2026AY 2014-2015
- Nima Specific Family Trust, Ahmedabad vs Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 70/AHD/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed11 Mar 2026AY 2013-14
- The South Indian Bank Limited, Thrissur vs DCIT, ThrissurITA 182/COCH/2025[2007-08]Status: Disposed6 Aug 2025AY 2007-08
- Viacom 18 Media Private Limited, Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 16(1)…ITA 1002/MUM/2025[2012-13]Status: Disposed23 May 2025AY 2012-13
- Puranmal Delhiwala, Wadala, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 23(2)(6), MumbaiITA 3785/MUM/2024[1993-94]Status: Disposed21 May 2025AY 1993-94
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Amritsar Haveli Cuisines Private Limited & Anr. vs. Amarbir Singh & Ors.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Abd Maestro Private Limited vs. Great Galleon Ventures LTDDelhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Jangeer Singh Trading As Jangeer Singh Kabulshah Agriculture Works vs. Yogesh Jangid Trading As Jangid Agro Engineering & Anr.Delhi · 3 Nov 2026
- Rabindranath Behera vs. The Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Dinesh Dash vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026