SMT. SUBBALAKSHMI vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL

PDF · subscribers
WP/4053/2024HC KarnatakaKAHC01007963202412 March 2024Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court allowed the petition. It noted that it was undisputed that the petitioner had not submitted a reply to the Section 148A(b) notice. Considering the petitioner's assertion that she would submit a reply if granted another opportunity, the Court deemed it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order dated 13.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) and subsequent notices/orders. The matter was remitted back to the ACIT for reconsideration from the stage of submitting the petitioner's reply to the Section 148A(b) notice. The Court directed the petitioner to appear before the ACIT on 22.04.2024 and granted her liberty to file her reply and documents on that date. The ACIT was directed to provide a reasonable opportunity and proceed in accordance with law. The impugned notices and orders at Annexures A, A1, A2, G, and H were set aside.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Smt. Subbalakshmi, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenging notices and orders issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (ACIT) for the assessment year 2016-17. The challenge was primarily against a notice under Section 148A(b) dated 07.02.2023, an order under Section 148A(d) dated 13.03.2023, a notice under Section 148 dated 13.03.2023, an order under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 147 dated 02.02.2024, and a notice under Section 271(1)(c) dated 02.02.2024. The petitioner contended that the Section 148A(b) notice was not served upon her, and she was unaware of it, preventing her from submitting a reply. She claimed this was due to bonafide reasons and unavoidable circumstances, and sought an opportunity to respond.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 07.02.2023, was properly served on the petitioner for the assessment year 2016-17, and if not, whether the subsequent proceedings are vitiated. Assessee's contention: The petitioner argued that the Section 148A(b) notice was not served upon her, and she was unaware of its issuance. Consequently, she could not submit her reply or response, and this omission was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances, and sufficient cause. She sought an opportunity to respond. Revenue's contention: The revenue contended that there was no merit in the petition and that it was liable to be dismissed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148A,Section 148A(b),Section 148A(d),Section 148,Section 143(3),Section 147,Section 271(1)(c)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2024:KHC:10176 WP No. 4053 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF MARCH, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.4053 OF 2024 (T-IT) BETWEEN:

SMT. SUBBALAKSHMI W/O LATE SHRI ANJANA MURTHY, NO.24, ANJANA MURTHY BUILDING, LOTTEGOLLAHALLI, RMV, 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560 094

…PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V., ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, BANGALORE-560 001.

2.

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (INV) THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR

GENERAL OF INCOME TAX, C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M. DILIP, ADVOCATE)

THIS W.P IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT DATED 07/02/2023 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049516358(1) ISSUED BY THE R1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2016-17 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A. AND ETC.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

Digitally signed by LEELAVATHI S R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2024:KHC:10176 WP No. 4053 of 2024

ORDER

In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

“ i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act dated 07.02.2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2022-23/1049516358(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure-A.

ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act dated 13.03.2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1050697158(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure-A1.

iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 13.03.2023 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1050699430(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure-A2.

iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under Section 143(3) r.w.s.147 Act, dated 02.02.2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/147/2023-24/1060459194 (1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure-G.

v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act, dated 02.02.2024 bearing DIN

- 3 -

NC: 2024:KHC:10176 WP No. 4053 of 2024

No.ITBA/PNL/S/271(1)(C)2023-24/1060459274(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2016-17 herein marked as Annexure-H.

vi) And pass such other orders as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notice issued by the respondents under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’) dated 07.02.2023 was not served upon the petitioner and the same was not sent to the existing e-mail and not received by petitioner and she was not aware of the notice and consequently, petitioner could not submit her reply / response along with documents to the said notice. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply / response along with documents to the Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and

- 4 -

NC: 2024:KHC:10176 WP No. 4053 of 2024

notices, the petitioner would do so and respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has not submitted reply / response along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of the petitioner that if one more opportunity is granted, petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure – A1 dated 13.03.2023 passed under Section 148A(d) of the IT Act and subsequent notice / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to Section 148A(b) notice and to proceed further in accordance with law. 6. In the result, pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed.

- 5 -

NC: 2024:KHC:10176 WP No. 4053 of 2024

(ii) Impugned notices / orders at Annexures A, A1, A2, G and H are hereby set aside. (iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure – A dated 07.02.2023. (iv) Petitioner is directed to appear before respondent No.1 on 22.04.2024 without awaiting further notice from respondent No.1. (v) Petitioner is reserved liberty to file reply / response along with documents on 22.04.2024, pursuant to which, respondent No.1 shall provide sufficient and reasonable opportunity to the petitioner and hear her and proceed further in accordance with law.

Sd/- JUDGE

SV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 23

More judgments on Section 148A

All 3,543 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →