SHRI SRINIVASAN PAGALTHIVARTHI vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(1)

PDF · subscribers
WP/23918/2025HC KarnatakaKAHC01052595202516 October 2025Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR5 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court of Karnataka disposed of the writ petition by directing the respondents, specifically Respondent No. 1 (Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax), to address the petitioner's grievances and consider his representation dated July 22, 2025. The respondents were ordered to pass appropriate orders, bearing in mind the material on record and in accordance with the law, within a period of one month from the receipt of the court's order. Furthermore, if Respondent No. 1 concluded that the TDS credit for AY 2019-20 was to be brought forward to AY 2020-21, they were directed to take necessary steps to credit the demand for AY 2020-21 and pass appropriate orders within one month thereafter. The court did not decide on the merits of the TDS carry-forward claim but directed the authorities to consider it.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Shri Srinivasan Pagalthivarthi, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka seeking directions to the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (1st respondent) to consider his representation dated July 22, 2025. The representation concerned the carry forward of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to Rs. 1,25,000/- from Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20 to AY 2020-21. The petitioner also sought rectification of an order dated July 12, 2023, passed by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC) (2nd respondent) to reflect this TDS credit and recompute his tax liability for AY 2020-21. The respondents acknowledged that the representation had not yet been considered and agreed to address it within a reasonable time.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the 1st respondent should be directed to expeditiously consider and dispose of the petitioner's representation dated July 22, 2025, affording him an opportunity of hearing and allowing him to file further submissions, and directing the carry forward of TDS of Rs. 1,25,000/- from AY 2019-20 to AY 2020-21 for re-determination of his liability for AY 2020-21. 2. Whether the 2nd respondent should be directed to rectify its order dated July 12, 2023, by granting credit for TDS of Rs. 1,25,000/- brought forward from AY 2019-20 to AY 2020-21, thereby re-determining the petitioner's liability for AY 2020-21. Assessee's Contention: The petitioner argued that his representation regarding the TDS credit had not been considered and sought directions for its expeditious disposal and rectification of the CPC order to include the TDS credit. The revenue (respondents) contended that they would consider and pass necessary orders on the representation if reasonable time was granted.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41294 WP No. 23918 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.23918 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN:

SHRI SRINIVASAN PAGALTHIVARTHI AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, (SENIOR CITIZENS BENEFIT NOT CLAIMED) SON OF LATE P.V. VASUDEVAN RESIDING AT #524, 16TH CROSS, NEAR BDA COMPLEX, INDIRANAGAR, 2ND STAGE, BENGALURU – 560 038. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE) AND:

1.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 3(1)(1)

BANGALORE BMTC BUILDING,

80 FEET ROAD, 6TH BLOCK,

KORAMANGALA,

BANGALORE – 560 095.

2.

CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE

INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

REPRESENTED HEREIN BY

THE ASSISTANT / DEPUTY DIRECTOR

OF INCOME TAX, CPC,

BANGALORE CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE,

BENGALURU – 560 500.

3.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

CIRCLE 7(1)(1), BANGALORE

BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD,

Digitally signed by CHANDANA B M Location: High Court of Karnataka

- 2 -

HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41294 WP No. 23918 of 2025

6TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA

BANGALORE – 560 095. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. DILIP AND SRI. E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATES FOR R-1 SRI. ARAVIND.V. CHAVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3)

THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUITON OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO EXPEDITIOUSLY CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OFF THE PETITIONER’S REPRESENTATION DATED 22.07.2025 (ANNEXURE-V) AFTER AFFORDING THE PETITIONER A REASONABLE AND EFFECTIVE OPPORTUNITY OF HEARING AND FILING FURTHER SUBMISSIONS AND DOCUMENTS, IF ANY, AND BY DIRECTING THAT THE CREDIT OF TDS AMOUNTING TO RS.1,25,000/- BE BROUGHT FORWARD FROM AY 2019-20 TO AY 2020-21.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

“(i) Directing the 1st respondent to expeditiously consider and dispose off the petitioner's representation dated 22.07.2025 (Annexure 'V') after affording the petitioner a reasonable and effective opportunity of hearing and filing further submissions and documents, if any, and by directing that the credit of TDS amounting to ` 1,25,000/- be brought forward from AY 2019-20 to AY 2020-21 and thus taken into consideration while redetermining the petitioner's liability under the Income-Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2020-21; without prejudice to the above and in any event,

- 3 -

HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41294 WP No. 23918 of 2025

(ii) directing that an order be passed forthwith by the 2nd Respondent rectifying the order dated 12.07.2023 bearing DIN: CPC/2021/U3/326596659, Ack. No.: 123509930240423 and Demand Reference No.: 2023202037160638444T passed by the 2nd respondent (Annexure 'J'), by granting the credit of TDS amounting to `1,25,000/- brought forward from AY 2019-20 to AY 2020-21, and thereby redetermining the petitioner's liability under the Act for AY 2020-21;

(iii) Directing that the petitioner's tax liability under the Income-Tax Act, 1961, for AY 2020-21 be recomputed in accordance with law and the facts of the case, and directing that consequent relief, in accordance with law and the facts of the case, may kindly be granted to the petitioner forthwith; and

(iv) pass such other or further orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interests of justice and equity.”

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3.

It is an undisputed fact that the petitioner’s representation at Annexure – V dated 22.07.2025 submitted to the respondents has not been considered so far by the respondents

- 4 -

HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41294 WP No. 23918 of 2025

nor any order has been passed on the same and as such, the petitioner is before this Court by way of the present petition. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that if reasonable time is given, the respondents shall consider and pass necessary order / take appropriate steps on the said representation, in accordance with law. 5. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and rival submissions, petition stands dispose of directing the respondents No.1 to address the grievances of the petitioner and consider his representation at Annexure – V dated 22.07.2025 and pass appropriate orders bearing in mind the material on record produced by the petitioner and in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. It is further directed that in the event respondent No.1 were to come to the conclusion that TDS Credit for the Assessment year 2019-20 in relation to the petitioner is to be brought forward to the Assessment year 2020-21, respondent No.1 shall take necessary steps in this regard to credit demand for the Assessment

- 5 -

HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41294 WP No. 23918 of 2025

year 2020-21 and take appropriate decision / pass appropriate orders within a period of one month thereafter. 7. Subject to the aforesaid observations and directions, the petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

SV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →