SRI MARAGOWDANAHALLI RAMESHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER

PDF · subscribers
WP/20329/2024HC KarnatakaKAHC01042993202414 August 2024Bench: S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR7 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court allowed the petition. It noted that it was undisputed that the petitioner had not submitted a reply to the Section 148A(b) notice. Accepting the petitioner's assertion that the omission was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances, and sufficient cause, the Court deemed it just and appropriate to grant one more opportunity. Consequently, the Court set aside the impugned order dated 27.04.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) and all subsequent notices and orders. The matter was remitted back to the Income Tax Officer (Respondent No.1) for reconsideration from the stage of submitting the petitioner's reply to the Section 148A(b) notice. Liberty was granted to the petitioner to submit additional pleadings and documents, which the respondent No.1 would consider before proceeding in accordance with law. The Court expressly did not decide on the merits of the assessment or penalties.

What were the facts?

The petitioner, Sri Maragowdanahalli Ramesha, filed a writ petition challenging notices and orders issued by the Income Tax Department for Assessment Year 2018-19. The challenged actions include a notice under Section 148A(b) dated 30/03/2022, an order under Section 148A(d) dated 27/04/2022, a notice under Section 148 dated 27/04/2022, an approval order under Section 147 r.w.s 144, 144B dated 10.11.2023, and penalty orders under Sections 271AAC(1), 272A(1)(d), and 270A dated 24/04/2024 and 26/04/2024 respectively. The petitioner contended that he did not receive the Section 148A(b) notice and therefore could not submit a reply, attributing this omission to bonafide reasons and sufficient cause.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 30/03/2022, was duly served on the petitioner, and if not, whether the subsequent proceedings are vitiated. 2. Whether the petitioner had sufficient cause for not submitting a reply to the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act. Assessee's Contentions: - The petitioner argued that the notice under Section 148A(b) dated 30/03/2022 was not received, and consequently, he was unaware of it and could not submit a reply or documents. - The inability to respond was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances, and sufficient cause. - The petitioner sought an opportunity to submit a reply, requesting the setting aside of the impugned orders and notices. Revenue's Contentions: - The learned counsel for the respondents submitted that there is no merit in the petition and it is liable to be dismissed.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 148A(b),Section 148A(d),Section 148,Section 147,Section 144,Section 144B,Section 271AAC(1),Section 272A(1)(d),Section 270A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

- 1 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 20329 OF 2024 (T-IT)

BETWEEN:

SRI MARAGOWDANAHALLI RAMESHA AGED 39 YEARS S/O LATE CHANDREGOWDA MARAGOWDANAHALLI VILLAGE GALGIKERE POST K R NAGAR MYSORE - 571602 PAN APLPR0734G …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V., ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD - 1(1) MYSORE - 570008

2.

NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE ADDITIONAL / JOINT /DEPUTY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO 401, 2ND FLOOR, E RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM DELHI - 110003

Digitally signed by NARASIMHA MURTHY VANAMALA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

3.

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3 THE OFFICE OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 3, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE - 560095 …RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. THIRUMALESH M, ADVOCATE)

THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148A(B) OF THE ACT, DATED 30/03/2022 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021- 22/1042174105(1), ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A; QUASH THE ORDER UNDER SECTION 148A(D) OF THE ACT, DATED 27/04/2022, BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042865924(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE A1; QUASH THE NOTICE UNDER SECTION 148 OF THE ACT DATED 27/04/2022 BEARING DIN NO. ITBA/AST/S/148.1/2022-23/1042865939(1) ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2018-19 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A2.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR

- 3 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioner seeks the following reliefs:

"i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148A(b) of the Act, dated 30/03/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/F/148A(SCN)/2021-22/1042174105(1), issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A.

ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order under Section 148A(d) of the Act, dated 27/04/2023, bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/F/148A/2022-23/1042865924(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A1.

iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the notice under Section 148 of the Act dated 27/04/2022 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/148_1/2022-23/1042865939(1) issued by the Respondent No.1 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A2.

iv) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the approval order under Section 147 r.w.s 144, 144B dated 10.11.2023 bearing DIN No. ITBA/AST/S/147/2023-24/1057861314(1), issued by the

- 4 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A3.

v) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order passed Under section 271AAC(1) of the Act dated 24/04/2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/PNL/F/271AAC(1/2024-25/1064328824) issued by the Respondent No. 2 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A4.

vi) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under section 272A(1)(d) of the Act dated 26/04/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024-25/1064388932(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A5.

vii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 270A of the Act dated 26/04/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/270A/2024-25/1064394001(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2018-19 herein marked as Annexure - A6."

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record. 3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on

- 5 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notice issued by the respondents under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), dated 30.03.2022 was not received by petitioner and he was not aware of the notice and consequently, the petitioner could not submit his reply/response along with the documents to the said notice. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply/response along with documents to the Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and the respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed. 5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has not submitted reply/response along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of the

- 6 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

petitioner that his inability and omission to submit a reply along with documents to Section 148A(b) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and if one more opportunity is granted, the petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned order at Annexure – A1 dated 27.04.2022 passed under Section 148A(d) of the IT Act and subsequent notice/orders, etc., and remit the matter back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh from the stage of submitting of reply by the petitioner to Section 148A(b) notice and to proceed further in accordance with law. 6. In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed. (ii) Impugned notices/orders at Annexures A, A1, A2, A3, A4, A5 and A6 are hereby set aside. (iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under

- 7 -

NC: 2024:KHC:32966 WP No. 20329 of 2024

Section 148A(b) of the IT Act at Annexure – A dated 30.03.2022.

(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit additional pleadings, documents, etc., to the respondent No.1, who shall consider the same and proceed further in accordance with law.

Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE

More judgments on Section 148A(b)

All 524 judgments and leading authorities on Section 148A(b) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →